Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 3–4, pp 283–298 | Cite as

Effects of time-varying flow and volume on cardiac output estimation from isotope dilution and residue detection

  • Frank S. Castellana
  • Steven Snappin
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Measurements of cardiac output from indicator dilution are subject to error when tracer is sampled at a constant rate but flow varies periodically. Using a pulsatile compartmental representation of a segment of the central circulation, we have examined the effect of time-varying flow and volume on determinations of cardiac output from isotope dilution and region-of-interest residue detection. The effects of input function dispersion, amplitude of flow variation, relative duration of systole, and injection directly into and proximal to a region-of-interest were studied. In contrast to distal concentration sampling where errors for comparable injection and flow characteristics are minimal at cardiac frequencies, errors from residue detection procedures can be as high as 15 to 20%, and depend on the region-of-interest, injection timing, and system parameters. Errors decrease with peripheral injection, increased dispersion of the input function, increased fractional duration of systole, and reduced amplitude of flow variation. Specific procedures for minimizing errors due to time-varying flow are discussed.

Keywords

Cardiac Output Input Function Injection Timing Isotope Dilution Flow Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bassingthwaighte, J. B., T. J. Knopp, and D. U. Anderson. Flow estimation by indicator dilution (bolus injection): Reduction of errors due to time-averaged sampling during unsteady flow.Circ. Res. 27:227–291, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassingthwaighte, J. B., and G. A. Holloway. Estimation of blood flow with radioactive tracers.Semin. Nucl. Med. 6:141–161, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyle, J. Indicator mixing in the left heart and re-examination of mean circulation time.J. Appl. Physiol. 37:541–546, 1974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castellana, F. S. Mathematical modeling of the central circulation. In:Quantitative Nuclear Cardiography, edited by R. N. Pierson, et al. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1975, p. 202–230.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cropp, G. J., and A. C. Burton. Theoretical considerations and model experiments on the validity of indicator dilution methods for measurements of variable flow.Circ. Res. 18:26–48, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Irisawa, H., M. F. Wilson, and R. F. Rushmer. Left ventricle as a mixing chamber.Circ. Res. 8:183–187, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishii, Y., and W. J. MacIntyre. Measurements of heart chamber values by analysis of dilution curves simultaneously recorded by scintillation camera.Circulation. 44:37–46, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McClure, J. A., W. W. Lacy, P. Latimer, and E. Newman. Indicator dilution in an atrioventricular system with competent or incompetent valves.Circ. Res. 7:794–806, 1959.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meier, P., and K. L. Zierler. On the theory of the indicator dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume.J. Appl. Physiol. 6:731–744, 1954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherman, H. On the theory of indicator dilution methods under varying blood flow conditions.Bull. Math. Biophys. 22:417–424, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spencer, J. L., A. Regina, F. S. Castellana, M. I. Friedman, and R. N. Pierson. Decontamination of region-of-interest curves using models of the central circulation. In: Nuclear Cardiology: Selected Computer Aspects. Symposium Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, January 22–23, 1978. Society of Nuclear Medicine, pp. 181–192.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephenson, J. L. Theory of the measurement of blood flow by the dilution of an indicator.Bull. Math. Biophys. 10:117–121, 1948.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swan, H. J., and W. Beck. Ventricular non-mixing as a source of error in the estimation of ventricular volume by the indicator dilution technique.Circ. Res. 8:989–998, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Visscher, M. B., and J. A. Johnson. The Fick principle: Analysis of potential errors in its conventional application.J. Appl. Physiol. 5:635–638, 1953.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zierler, K. L. Theory of the use of arteriovenous concentration differences for measuring metabolism in steady and non-steady states.J. Clin. Invest. 40:2111–2125, 1961.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zierler, K. L. Equations for measuring blood flow by external monitoring of radioisotopes.Circ. Res. 16:309–321, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pergamon Press Ltd. 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank S. Castellana
    • 1
    • 2
  • Steven Snappin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew York
  2. 2.Biomedical Engineering CenterSt. Luke's Institute for Health SciencesNew York

Personalised recommendations