Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 130–143 | Cite as

On the interpretation of kernels

I. Computer simulation of responses to impulse pairs
  • George Hung
  • Lawrence Stark
  • Pieter Eykhoff
Article

Abstract

A method is presented for the use of a unit impulse response and responses to impulse pairs of variable separation in the calculation of the second-degree kernels of a quadratic system. A quadratic system may be built from simple linear terms of known dynamics and a multiplier. Computer simulation results on quadratic systems with building elements of various time constants indicate reasonably that the larger time constant term before multiplication dominates in the envelope of the off-diagonal kernel curves as these move perpendicular to and away from the main diagonal. The smaller time constant term before multiplication combines with the effect of the time constant after multiplication to dominate in the kernel curves in the direction of the second-degree impulse response, i.e., parallel to the main diagonal. Such types of insight may be helpful in recognizing essential aspects of (second-degree) kernels; they may be used in simplifying the model structure and, perhaps, add to the physical/physiological understanding of the underlying processes.

Keywords

Computer Simulation Time Constant Impulse Response Large Time Constant Term 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alper, P., and Poortvliet, D. C. J.On the use of Volterra series representation and higher order impulse responses for nonlinear systems. Summary Report, Technological University, Electronics Laboratory, Delft, Netherlands, June 1963.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, F. H. Pupillary response to double pulse stimulation: A study of nonlinearity in the human pupil system.Journal of the Optical Society of America 1963,53.Google Scholar
  3. Diskin, M., Boneh, A., and Golan A. On the impossibility of a partial mass violation in surface runoff systems.Water Resources Research 1975,11, 236–244.Google Scholar
  4. Eykhoff, P.System identification: parameter and state estimation. New York: Wiley, 94–104, 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Frechet, M. Sur les fonctionnels continues.Annales de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure 1910, 193–219.Google Scholar
  6. Hung, G.Interpretation and physiological applications of higher degree kernel identification method. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Lee, Y. W.Statistical theory of communication. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, Y. W., and Schetzen, M. D.Measurement of the kernels of a nonlinear system by cross correlation. Quart. Prog. Rept. No. 60., R.L.E., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961. Pp. 118–130.Google Scholar
  9. Marmarelis, P. Z., and Naka, K. White noise analysis of neuron chain: An application of the Wiener theory.Science 1972,175, 1276–1278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sandberg, A., and Stark, L. Wiener G-function analysis as an approach to nonlinear characteristics of human pupil light reflex.Brain Research 1968,11, 194–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Stark, L.Neurological control systems. New York: Plenum, 1968.Google Scholar
  12. Volterra, V.Theory of functionals and of integral and integro-differentials equations. London: Blackie and Sons, 1930.Google Scholar
  13. Watanabe, A., and Stark, L. Kernel method for nonlinear analysis: Identification of a biological control system.Mathematical Bioscience 1975,27, 99–108.Google Scholar
  14. Wiener, N.Nonlinear problems in random theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Technology Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Press, Inc. 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Hung
    • 1
  • Lawrence Stark
    • 1
  • Pieter Eykhoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Physiological Optics and Engineering ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations