Behavior Genetics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 65–69 | Cite as

The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note

  • John C. Loehlin
Article

Abstract

Attention is called to a common misinterpretation of a bivariate Cholesky analysis as if it were a common and specific factor analysis. It is suggested that an initial Cholesky behavior genetic analysis should often be transformed into a different form for interpretation. Formulas are provided for four transformations in the bivariate case.

Key Words

Cholesky triangular decomposition simplex multivariate behavior-genetic analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, L. A., Vernon, P. A., and Ho, H.-Z. (1991). The genetic correlation between intelligence and speed of information processing.Behav. Genet. 21:351–367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boomsma, D. I., and Molenaar, P. C. M. (1987). The genetic analysis of repeated measures. I. Simplex models.Behav. Genet. 17:111–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhrich, N., Bailey, J. M. and Martin, N. G. (1991). Sexual orientation, sexual identity, and sex-dimorphic behaviors in male twins.Behav. Genet. 21:75–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford, C. B., and DeFries, J. C. (1978). Factor analysis of genetic and environmental correlation matrices.Multivar. Behav. Res. 13:297–318.Google Scholar
  5. Duffy, D. L., Manicavasagar, V., O'Connell, D., Silove, D., Tennant, C., and Langelludecke, P. (1994). Type A personality in Australian twins.Behav. Genet. 24:469–475.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern Factor Analysis 3rd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989). Testing structural equation models for twin data using LISREL.Behav. Genet. 19:9–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992).Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  9. Petrill, S. A., and Thompson, L. A. (1993). The phenotypic and genetic relationships among measures of cognitive ability, temperament, and scholastic achievement.Behav. Genet. 23:511–518.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Plomin, R., and DeFries, J. C. (1981). Multivariate behavioral genetics and development: Twin studies. In Gedda, L., Parisi, P., and Nance, W. E. (eds.)Twin Research 3. Part B: Intelligence, Personality, and Development, Liss, New York, pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
  11. Plomin, R., Pedersen, N. L., Lichtenstein, P., and McClearn, G. E. (1994). Variability and stability in cognitive abilities are largely genetic later in life.Behav. Genet. 24:207–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmitz, S., Cherny, S. S., Fulker, D. W., and Mrazek, D. A. (1994). Genetic and environmental influences on early childhood behavior.Behav. Genet. 24:25–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Truett, K. R., Eaves, L. J., Meyer, J. M., Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1992). Religion and education as mediators of attitudes: A multivariate analysis.Behav. Genet. 22: 43–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • John C. Loehlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TexasAustin

Personalised recommendations