Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Science classroom practices and design characteristics of instructional materials: A case study

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ALLEN, L.Science curriculum inventory. University of Hawaii, 1974.

  • BELANGER, M. The study and teaching of new curricula.The Science Teacher, 1964, 31(7), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEKKERS, J. Science activity checklist. Unpublished Manuscript, James Cook University of North Queensland, 1977.

  • DEKKERS, J. & SHIELD, M. An instrument for recording events and behaviours in the mathematics classroom.Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, 1978, 3, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOWD, A. Teacher and student perceptions of theWeb of Life course. Unpublished results, James Cook University of North Queensland, 1979.

  • EASH, J. M. Developing an instrument for assessing instructional materials. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Minnesota, 1970.

  • EVANS, T. P. & BALZER, A. L. An inductive approach to the study of bilogy teacher behaviours.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1970, 7, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • KING, A. R. & BROWNEL, J. A.T curriculum and the disciplines of knowledge:A theory of curriculum practice. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • KNIGHT, M.Curriculum materials analysis system. Boulder: Social Science Education Consortium Inc., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOCHENDORFER, L. H. The development of a student checklist to determine classroom teaching practices in high school biology. In A. Lee (ed.)Research and curriculum development in science education. Texas: Science Education, University of Texas, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • MORGAN, K. P., BEST, E. D., BETJEMAN, K., LARKUM, A., PITMAN, K. & THOMSON, J.Biological science:The web of life, (2nd ed.). Canberra: Australian Academy of Science, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • NORTHFIELD, J. R. Changing perspectives of the science education that may be associated with curriculum development.Research in Science Education, 1975, 5, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • OWEN, J. M. & TISHER, R. P.Curriculum adoption:The fate of a national curriculum project in Australia. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • PARAKH, J. S. A study of teacher-pupil interaction in high school biology classes.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1969, 6(3), 284–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • POTTENGER, F. et al.Foundational approaches in science teaching. Hawaii: Curriculum Research and Development Group, University of Hawaii, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • POWER, C. N. A critical review of science classroom interaction studies.Studies in Science Education, 1977, 4, I-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • POWER, C. N. & TISHER, R. P. A study of the effects of teaching strategies in ASEP classrooms.Australian Journal of Education, 1975, 19(2), 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAMSEY, C. A. & HOWE, R. W. An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science. Part 1 Outcomes of Instruction.Science Teacher, 1969, 36(3), 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • TISHER, R. P. Classroom interaction analysis: the new religion.Research, 1972, 2, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. John Dekkers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Dowd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dekkers, J., Dowd, A. Science classroom practices and design characteristics of instructional materials: A case study. Research in Science Education 9, 149–157 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359155

Keywords

Search

Navigation