Skip to main content
Log in

Innovative propagation methods in seed tuber multiplication programmes

  • Review
  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The production of large volumes of vitroplantlets and greenhouse tubers for increasing the rate of multiplication at the start of seed programmes provides the opportunity of reducing the total number of field generations grown before the seed moves into commerce. This implementation is especially useful for countries where high quality potato seed tubers cannot be produced because there are no vector-free production areas.

This review covers the following steps: a) laboratory production of microplantlets and microtubers; b) minituber production in the glasshouse; c) storage and dormancy of micro- and minitubers; d) field performance of micro- and minitubers compared with conventional seed tubers; e) incorporation of the mentioned propagules in seed production systems.

Many optimized protocols are already available for propagating plantlets, inducing microtubers and obtaining minitubers in the glasshouse at all periods of the year. Advanced molecular approaches techniques (RFLP and RAPD) to detect genetic variation in the progeny of these propagules have been described. Investigations carried out in this field have shown genetic stability, with the propagules usually reproducing plants true-to-type and tubers without deviants. By contrast, variations were demonstrated in DNA extracted from old suspension cell culture. Field trials assessed a lower yield potential crops from in vitro propagules compared with conventional seed tubers., mainly due to slow early crop development and the failure of plants caused by early stress after emergence. This may cause problems when the growing season is short because of the necessity for planting late to avoid night frosts and the mandatory haulm killing dates, common in many seed producing areas. Strategies for improving the field performance of micro- and minitubers are discussed. The most promising crop husbandry techniques appear to be: a) using tubers of a suitable physiological age, properly presprouted and encapsulated; b) optimizing the time application of fertilizer and irrigation, and c) using floating films.

Outside the classical seed tuber areas of Northern Europe where the length of the growing period for pre-basic seed is usually not more than 80 days, the growing season is long enough to obtain reasonable yields even from micro- and minitubers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahloowalia, B.S., 1982. Plant regeneration from callus culture in potato.Euphytica 31: 755–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahloowalia, B.S., 1994. Production and performance of potato minitubers.Euphytica 75: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizarri, M., L. Borghi & P. Ranalli, 1995. Effects of activated charcoal on induction and development of microtubers in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Annals Applied Biology 27: 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodlaender, K.B.A. & J. Marinus, 1987. Effect of physiological age on growth vigour of seed potatoes of two cultivars. 3. Effect on plant growth under controlled conditions.Potato Research 30: 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bus, C.B., A.J. Haverkort, P.C. Struik & D.E. van der Zaag, 1990. Influence of the rate of early growth on the field performance of microtubers in Netherlands.Abstracts of the 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, pp. 522–523.

  • Cassells, A.C., E.M. Goetz & S. Austin, 1983. Phenotypic variation in plants produced from lateral buds, stem explants and single-cell-derived callus of potato.Potato Research 26: 367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Désiré, S., J.P. Couillerot, J.L. Hilbert & J. Vasseur, 1995a. Protein changes inSolanum tuberosum during in vitro tuberization of nodal cuttings.Plant Physiology Biochemistry 33: 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Désiré, S., J.P. Couillerot, J.L. Hilbert & J. Vasseur, 1995b. Protein changes inSolanum tuberosum during storage and dormancy breaking of in vitro microtubers.Plant Physiology Biochemistry 33: 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doncaster, J.P. & P.H. Gregory, 1948. The spread of virus diseases in the potato crop.Agricultural Research Council Report series No 7. H.M.S.O. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D.A. & E.E. Ewing, 1984. Initial anatomical changes associated with tuber formation on single-node potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cuttingAnnals of Botany 53: 607–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, N.O., R. Estrada, P. Tovar, J.E. Bryan & J. Dodds, 1984. Tissue culture micropropagation, conservation and export of potato germplasm. Specialized Technology Document CIP, Lima.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forti, E., G. Mandolino & P. Ranalli, 1991. In vitro tuber induction: influence of the variety and of the media.Acta Horticulturae 300: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, N. & J. Blake, 1989. The induction and development of potato microtubers in vitro on media free of growth regulating substances.Annals of Botany 63: 663–674.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, L.E., 1956. Some factors for tuberization in the potato plant.American Journal of Botany 43: 281–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannapel, D.J., 1991. Characterization of the early events of potato tuber development.Physiologia Plantarum 83: 568–573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkort, A.J. & J. Marinus, 1990. Preliminary results on the field performance of microtubers as propagation material.Abstracts of the 11th Triennial Conference of the EAPR, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 382–383.

  • Hussey, G. & N.J. Stacey, 1981. In vitro propagation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Annals of Botany 48: 787–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussey, G. & N.J. Stacey, 1984. Factors affecting the formation of in vitro tubers of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.).Annals of Botany 53: 565–578.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ittersum, M.K. van & P.C. Struik, 1992. Relation between stolon and tuber characteristics and the duration of tuber dormancy in potato.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittersum, M.K. van, K. Scholte & S. Warshavsky, 1993. Advancing growth vigour of seed potatoes by haulm application of gibberellic acid and storage temperature regimes.American Potato Journal 70: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E.D., 1988 A current assessment of in vitro culture and other multiplication methods in North America and Europe.Americam Potato Journal 65: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krijthe, N. 1955. Observations on the formation and growth of tubers of the potato plant.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 3: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krijthe, N., 1962. Observations on the sprouting of seed potatoes.European Potato Journal 5: 316–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, Y., D.J. Donnelly, W.K. Koleman & R.R. King, 1995. Microtuber dormancy in three potato cultivars.American Potato Journal 72: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc, Y. & D.J. Donnelly, 1990. Seasonal differences in the field performance of micropropagated potato under a short growing season in Quebec.American Potato Journal 67: 507–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., 1985. Propagation of potato by direct transfer of in vitro proliferated shoot cuttings into the field.Scientia Horticulturae 26: 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen W.J.M., 1994. Effect of weight of potato minitubers on sprout growth, emergence and plant characteristics at emergence.Potato Research 37: 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen, W.J.M., & P.C. Struik, 1992a. Influence of a single non-destructive harvest on potato plantlets grown for minituber production.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen, W.J.M. & P.C. Struik, 1992b. Production of potato minitubers by repeated harvesting: plant productivity and initiation, growth and resorption of tubersNetherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 40: 342–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen, W.J.M. & P.C. Struik, 1992c Production of potato minitubers by repeated harvesting: effects of crop husbandry on yield parameters.Potato Research 35: 419–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lommen, W.J.M. & P.C. Struik, 1993. Performance of potato minitubers in a controlled environment after different storage periods.Potato Research 36: 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lommen, W.J.M. & P.C. Struik, 1994. Field performance of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and conventional seed tubers: Crop establishment and yield formation.Potato Research 37: 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madec, P. & P. Perennec, 1955. Les possibilités d'évolution des germes de la pomme de terre et leur conséquences.Annales de l'Amélioration des Plantes 5: 555–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandolino, G., M. Bagatta & P. Ranalli, 1993. In vitro microtuber induction: condition and genome stabilità.Abstracts of the 12th Triennial Conference of the EAPR Paris, France, pp. 251–252.

  • Mandolino, G., S. De Marco, V. Faeti, M. Bagatta, A. Carboni & P. Ranalli, 1996. Stability of fingerprints ofSolanum tuberosum plants derived from conventional tubers and vitrotubers.Plant Breeding 115: 439–444.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melching J.B., S.A. Slack & E.D. Jones, 1993. Field performance of peat-lite mix encapsulated small minitubers.American Potato Journal 70: 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milthorpe, F.L., 1963. Some aspects of plant growth. In: J.D. Ivins & F. Milthorpe (Eds), The Growth of the Potato, Butterworth, London, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorby, J. & F.L. Milthorpe, 1975. The Potato. In: L.T. Evans (Ed.), Crop Physiology-some case histories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 225–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige, T. & F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures.Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, P.J., E.J. Allen, J.N. Bean, R.L. Griffith, S.A. Jones & J.L. Jones, 1983. Accumulated day-degrees as a measure of physiological age and the relationships with growth and yield in early potato varieties.Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101: 613–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli, P., M. Bernabei, V. Tassinari, G. Mandolino, P. Benso, C. Cerato & A. Canova, 1988. Produzione di tuberi prebase virus-esenti.L'Informatore Agrario 23: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli, P., E. Forti, G. Mandolino & B. Casarini, 1990a. Improving production and health of seed potato stock in Italy.Potato Research 33: 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli, P., E. Forti & G. Mandolino, 1990b. Attempts to improve seed potato production in Italy.Abstracts of the 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, pp. 226–227.

  • Ranalli, P., M. Bizarri, L. Borghi & M. Mari, 1994a. Genotypic influence onin vitro induction, dormancy length, advancing age and agronomical performance of potato microtubers (Solanum tuberosum L.).Annals Applied Biology 125: 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli, P., F. Bassi, G. Ruaro, P. Del Re, M. Di Candilo & G. Mandolino, 1994b. Micro- and minitubers obtainment and comparison of their field performance with “normal” tubers.Potato Research 37: 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranalli, P., T. Baschieri, M. Bizarri & P. Bai, 1994c. Valutazione delle tecniche di produzione dei minituberi e loro trattamento pre-trapianto.L'Informatore Agrario 49: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca, W.M., N.O. Espinoza, M.R. Roca & J.E. Bryan, 1978. A tissue culture method for the rapid propagation of potatoes.American Potato Journal 55: 691–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roest, S. & G.S. Bokelmann, 1980. In vitro adventitious bud technique for vegetative propagation and mutation breeding of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). 1. Vegetative propagation in vitro through adventitious shoot formation.Potato Research 23: 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, G., F.G. De Bertholdi & R. Tizio, 1987. In vitro mass tuberization as a contribution to potato micropropagation.Potato Research 30: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rykaczewska, K., 1992. Effect of vegetation period temperature and physiological age of minitubers on the development of plant and yield.Potato Research 35: 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slimmon, T., V.S. Machado & R. Coffin, 1989. The effect of light on in vitro microtuberization of potato cultivars.American Potato Journal 66: 843–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struik, P.C. & W.J.M. Lommen, 1990. Production, storage and use of micro- and minitubers.Abstracts of the 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, pp. 122–123.

  • Taylor, M.A., H.V. Davies & L.A. Scobie, 1991. Molecular changes associated with tuberization inSolanum tuberosum. Differential expression of α-tubulin isotype.Physiologia Plantarum 81: 244–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. & C. Hu, 1982. In vitro mass tuberization and virus-free seed potato in Taiwan.American Potato Journal 59: 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattinema, G.A., 1983. Micropropagation as an alternative technology for potato production in Indonesia. Ph.D. Thesis University of Wisconsin-Madison. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University Microfilms International, 202 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, S.G., R. Cabello, P. Tovar & J.H. Dodds, 1987. Rapid seed multiplication into beds microtubers and in vitro plants.Potato Research 30: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaag, D.E. van der, 1990. The implication of micropropagation for the future of seed potato production system in Europe.Abstracts of the 11th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, pp. 28–44.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ranalli, P. Innovative propagation methods in seed tuber multiplication programmes. Potato Res 40, 439–453 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358004

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358004

Additional keywords

Navigation