Potato Research

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 431–438 | Cite as

Comparison of hydroponic culture and culture in a peat/sand mixture and the influence of nutrient solution and plant density on seed potato yields

  • J. Muro
  • V. Díaz
  • J. L. Goñi
  • Carmen Lamsfus
Article

Summary

Two culture systems for propagating first generation potatoes were compared; the traditional system used a peat/sand mixture with mineral fertilizer, and hydroponic culture used perlite and nutrient solution. Total production and the number of tubers obtained using the hydroponic system were significantly higher than using the traditional culture system. Tuber yields from in vitro plants and minitubers depended upon time of year. During the autumn/winter cycle yield from minitubers was double that from in vitro plants, whereas the reverse was true during the spring/summer cycle. Four hydroponic test cultures were carried out to study the influence of seed density. The number of tubers obtained increased significantly with seed density but there was no decrease in the number of large-diameter tubers.

Additional keywords

minitubers in vitro plants autumn-winter cycle spring-summer cycle Solanum tuberosum L. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodlaender, K.B.A. & A.J. Reestman, 1968. The interaction of nitrogen supply and plant density in potatoes.Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 16: 165–176.Google Scholar
  2. Boersing, M.R. & S.A. Wagner, 1988. Hydroponics systems for production of seed tubers.American Potato Journal 65: 470–471.Google Scholar
  3. Burg, P.F.J. van, 1967. Relation of rate of nitrogen fertilization, seed spacing and seed size to yield of potatoes.Netherlands Nitrogen Technical Bulletin 4, 30 pp.Google Scholar
  4. De la Morena, I., A. Guillén, J.A. Navas & M.A. González. 1993. Influencia del tamaño del tubérculo utilizado como simiente sobre la producción del cultivo de patata. Actas de la X Reunión de la Sociedad Española de Fisiología Vegetal. III Congreso Hispano-Portugués de Fisiología Vegetal.Google Scholar
  5. Domínguez, A., 1984. Tratado de fertilización. Ed. Mundi-Prensa. Madrid.Google Scholar
  6. Guarda, G. & S. Giuiari, 1983. Effetto dell'investimento sulla produzione in tuberi seme di varietá di patata.Sementi Elette 5: 23–28.Google Scholar
  7. Halderson, J.L., J.C. Ojala, G.W. Harding & E.V. Musselman, 1992. Influence of seed placement on Russet Burbank potato yield and grade.American Potato Journal 69: 31–38.Google Scholar
  8. Hernández, H., E. Ortiz & P. Marrero, 1985. Influence of plant density on microclimate and yields of seed potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.).Cultivos Tropicales 7: 77–86.Google Scholar
  9. Mendoza, H.A. & F.L. Haynes, 1977. Inheritance of tuber initiation in tuber bearingSolanum as influenced by photoperiod.American Potato Journal 54: 243–252.Google Scholar
  10. Midmore, D.J., 1988. Potato (Solanum spp.) in the hot tropics. VI. Plant population effects on soil temperature, plant development and tuber yield.Fields Crops Research 19: 183–200.Google Scholar
  11. Sarker, M.H. & M.H. Kabir, 1991. Effects of spacing on seedling tuber production from true potato seeds.Potato Research, 16: 56–61.Google Scholar
  12. Steiner, A.A., 1980. The selective capacity of plants for ions and its importance for the composition and treatment of the nutrient solution. Proceedings Congress of Soilless Culture, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
  13. Tello, J.C., 1990. El suelo como ente vivo. Curso de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente, Pamplona. Spain, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Thornton, M.K. & R. Neundorfer, 1986. Field performance of minitubers as affected by size and greenhouse harvest date.American Potato Journal (Abstract) 63: 458.Google Scholar
  15. Verdure, M., 1986. Calcule de la composition de la solution nutritive Coïc-Lesaint, Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. Wattimena, G., B. McCownet & G. Weis, 1983. Comparative field performance of potatoes from microculture.American Potato Journal 60: 27–33.Google Scholar
  17. Wheeler, R.M., C.L. Mackowiak, J.C. Sager, W.M. Knott & C.R. Hinkle, 1990. Potato growth and yield using Nutrient Film Technique (NFT).American Potato Journal 67: 177–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Muro
    • 1
  • V. Díaz
    • 1
  • J. L. Goñi
    • 2
  • Carmen Lamsfus
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Pública de NavarraPamplonaSpain
  2. 2.Organización de la Patata del Pirineo Occidental S.A.Noain-PamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations