Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 317–332 | Cite as

Attentional allocation processes in individuals at risk for depression

  • Rick E. Ingram
  • Christine Z. Bernet
  • Susan C. McLaughlin
Article

Abstract

Cognitive models of depression typically emphasize cognitive schemas as important variables in the depression process. To date, evidence of these schemas is difficult to detect in remitted depressed individuals unless they have specifically been activated by factors such as negative moods. The present study tested one aspect of schema activation, attentional allocation, in individuals who had previously experienced a major depressive episode. Using a dichotic listening task to assess attention to negative and positive stimuli, results indicated no differences in non-mood-primed subjects. For subjects who had been primed by a negative mood induction, formerly depressed individuals evidenced greater error rates for both negative and positive stimuli, while never-depressed subjects evidenced decreased error rates for negative and positive stimuli. These results appear to suggest a schema activation process that is emotionally diffuse but unique to individuals at risk for depression.

Key Words

depression attention information processing vulnerability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Alloy, L. B., & Metalsky, G. I. (1990). Hopelessness depression: An empirical search for a theory-based subtype. In R. E. Ingram (Ed.),Contemporary psychological approaches to depression: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 37–58). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I., & Alloy, L. B. (1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression.Psychological Review, 96, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alloy, L. B. (1988).Cognitive processes in depression. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington: APA.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, P. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (1988). Psychosocial functioning in depression: Distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences.Psychological Bulletin, 104, 97–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T. (1967).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: New perspectives In P. J. Clayton & J. E. Barrett (Eds.),Treatment of depression: Old controversies and new approaches. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, A. T. (1987) Cognitive models of depression.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 1, 5–37.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation.Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewin, C. R. (1988).Cognitive foundations of clinical psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, D. M., & Teasdale, J. D. (1985). Constraints on the effects of mood and memory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1595–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.Google Scholar
  14. Derry, P. A., & Kuiper, N. A. (1981). Schematic processing and self-reference in clinical depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 286–297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Garber, J., & Hollon, S. D. (1991). What can specificity designs say about causality in psychopathology research?Psychological Bulletin, 110, 129–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberg, M. S., & Beck, A. T. (1989). Depression versus anxiety: A test of the content specificity hypothesis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 9–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenberg, M. S., Vazquez, C. V., & Alloy, L. B. (1988). Depression versus anxiety: Differences in self and other schemata. In L. B. Alloy (Ed.),Cognitive processes in depression (pp. 109–142). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Haaga, D., Dyck, M. J., Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression.Psychological Bulletin, 110, 215–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hammen, C. L. (1991).Depression runs in families: The social context of risk and resilience in children of depressed mothers. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Hammen, C. L., Miklowitz, D. J., & Dyck, D. (1986). Stability and severity parameters of depressive self-schema responding.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 23–45.Google Scholar
  21. Hollon, S. D., Evans, M., & DeRubeis, R. (1987). Causal mediation of change in treatment for depression: Discriminating between nonspecificity and noncausality.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 139–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingram, R. E. (1984). Toward an information processing analysis of depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research 8, 443–478.Google Scholar
  23. Ingram, R. E. (1990). Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 156–176.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingram, R. E., Kendall, P. C., Smith, T. W., Donnell, C. & Ronan, K. (1987). Cognitive specificity in emotional distress.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 734–742.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingram, R. E., Smith, T. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1983). Depression and information processing: Self-schemata and the encoding of self-relevant information.Journal of personality and Social Psychology 45, 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ingram, R. E., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1991). Cognition in depression. In P. A. Magaro (Eds.),Annual review of psychopathology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Ingram, R. E., & Reed, M. J. (1986). Information encoding in depression: Findings, issues, and future directions. In R. E. Ingram (Ed.),Information processing approaches to clinical psychology, Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L., & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 289–299.Google Scholar
  29. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Nasby, W. (1981). Cognitive tasks in clinical assessment: An exercise in applied psychology. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.),Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions (pp. 287–317). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (1979).Cognitive psychology and information processing. New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Lewinsohn, P. M., Steinmetz, L., Larson, D. W., & Franklin, J. (1981). Depression-related cognition: Antecedent or consequence?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 213–219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lubin, B., Zuckerman, M., & Woodward, L. (1985).Bibliography for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
  33. Maitin, M., Williams, R. M., Clark, D. M. (1991). Does anxiety lead to selective processing of threat related information?Behavior Research and Therapy, 29, 147–160.Google Scholar
  34. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves.American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathews, A. (1989).Cognitive bias in depression and anxiety: Same or different? Paper presented at the meeting of the World Congress of Cognitive Therapy, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  36. Matthews, G., & Southall, A. (1991). Depression and the processing of emotional stimuli: A study of semantic priming.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miranda, J., & Persons, J. B. (1988). Dysfunctional attitudes are mood-state dependent.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 76–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Miranda, J., Persons, J. B., & Byers, C. N. (1990). Endorsement of dysfunctional beliefs depends on current mood state.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 237–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mogg, K., & Marden, R. (1990). Processing of emotional information in anxious subjects.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 227–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology, New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  41. Neisser, U. (1976).Cognition and reality. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  42. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1987). Sex-differences in unipolar depression.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Norman, D. A. (1986). Toward a theory of memory and attention.Psychological Review, 75, 522–536.Google Scholar
  44. Reed, S. K. (1991).Cognition: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  45. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Segal, Z. V., & Shaw, B. F. (1986). Cognition in depression: A reappraisal of Coyne & Gotlib's critique.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 671–694.Google Scholar
  47. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1990).Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R—Patient Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  48. Teasdale, J. D. (1983). Negative thinking in depression: Cause, effect, or reciprocal relationship?Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Teasdale, J. D. (1988). Cognitive vulnerability to persistent depression.Cognition and Emotion, 2, 247–274.Google Scholar
  50. Teasdale, J. D., & Dent, J. (1987). Cognitive vulnerability to depression: An investigation of two hypotheses.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 113–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1990).Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester, England: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965).Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rick E. Ingram
    • 1
  • Christine Z. Bernet
    • 2
  • Susan C. McLaughlin
    • 2
  1. 1.Doctoral Training Facility, Department of PsychologySan Diego State UniversitySan Diego
  2. 2.San Diego State University/University of CaliforniaSan Diego

Personalised recommendations