Skip to main content
Log in

Student teachers' conceptions of how to recognise a “Good” primary science teacher: Does two years in a teacher education program make a difference?

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have suggested that preservice teacher education has little impact on student teacher conceptions about various facets of teaching and learning. Most of these studies refer to generic teaching and learning, and very few have related to primary science in particular. To explore this area eight primary student teachers were interviewed on six occasions during the first two years of their Bachelor of Teaching degree. This paper reports the findings from part of these interviews. It describes the (sometimes changing) conceptions which these eight students held about how they would recognise a “good” teacher of science and the people and experiences they believed influenced the formation of these views. The differential impact of past and present teachers and the teacher education program revealed possible implications for practica and science curriculum units in particular, if teacher education is going to have an influence on preservice teachers' conceptions about teaching and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Smith, D. C. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teacher's conceptions of the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 475–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1994). Constructing science teaching in the elementary school: The socialisation of a science enthusiast teacher.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Science Education (ASE). (1988).Initiatives in primary science: An evaluation report. Hatfield, Herts: ASE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council. (1994).Science: A statement on science for Australian schools. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beisenhertz, P. C. (1993). “E” is for exemplary.Science and Children, 31(1), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. C., Wise, K. C., & Okey, J. R. (1983, April). Development of an integrated science process skills test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, Texas.

  • Burry, J. A., & Bolland, K. A. (1992). Describing expert science teaching.Journal of Personnel Evaluation, 5, 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, K. (1990). Teacher's knowledge and learning to teach. In: W. R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291–310). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers' early conceptions of classroom practice.Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, N., & McAllister, R. (1988). Pupils' learning of science in primary schools: A systemlevel investigation.Research in Science Education, 18, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (1994).Professional development schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET). (1989).Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1990). Themes in teacher education research. In W. R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 3–24). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M. J. (1995). Education: A case study of getting it wrong.Australian Educational Researcher, 22(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. In W. R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 212–233). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florio-Ruane, S., & Lensmire, T. J. (1990). Transforming future teachers' ideas about writing instruction.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers' knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year long assessment.Science Education, 77(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternative view on professional growth in teaching.Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. (1990). ‘Children's science’: A decade of developments in constructivist views of science teaching and learning.Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 36(4), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R., Slattery, M., Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. (1993). A case study exploration of development in preservice science teachers.Science Education, 77(1), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, B. F., & Rowell, P. (1995). Elementary preservice teachers: Constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science, and the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 589–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1992).The teaching of science. London: Fulton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach.American Educational Resarch Journal, 26(2), 160–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, P., Burchart, B., Butts, D., Tweist, G., Krause, J., Ukens, L., Fuller, M., & McCurdy, M. (1988). Excellence in elementary science. In: J. E. Penick & M. Bame (Eds.),Focus on excellence: Elementary science revisited. Washington: National Science Teachers' Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers.Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1991). Metamorphosis, adaption, or evolution? Preservice science teachers' concerns and perceptions of teaching and planning.Science Education, 75(4), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975).Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichel, A. G. (1994). Performance assessment: Five practical approaches.Science and Children, 32(2), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, J., & Colbert, J. A. (1988).The intern teacher casebook. San Francisco. Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (1995, July).Student teachers' perceptions of how to recognise a good primary science teacher: Does two years in a teacher education program make a difference? Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association Conference, La Trobe University, Bendigo Campus, Victoria.

  • Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1989). Case studies of exemplary science and mathematics teaching.School Science and Mathematics, 89(4), 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1990). What does it mean to be an exemplary teacher?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. S. (1990). Beliefs of prospective elementary teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. M. (1990). Teacher Socialization. In W. R. Houston (Ed.),Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329–348). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Skamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skamp, K. Student teachers' conceptions of how to recognise a “Good” primary science teacher: Does two years in a teacher education program make a difference?. Research in Science Education 25, 395–429 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357385

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357385

Keywords

Navigation