Preservice teachers: Process skill entry behaviour and opinions about teaching primary science
- 40 Downloads
This group of preservice teachers entered their education programme with conceptions about teaching primary science which are biased towards science content and preparation for secondary science. However, although process skills are not mentioned specifically by the vast majority of students, about a third of the intake considered “problem solving/discovering” things to be a purpose for teaching primary science. There would appear to be a ‘base’ for change towards a balanced process-product so favourably to the structured questionnaire on choice of teaching strategies tends to support this opinion.
Process skill competency and orientation must be addressed in the preservice science units but with an appropriate emphasis on their interdependence with concept development. Some input ensuring an understanding of the processes within the overall scientific framework would seem to be required.
The next stage of this study will be to compare the pre- and post-unit data to determine a measure of the changes (if any) that have occurred. As the unit focusses on student led discussions related to the interdependence of science process skill and concept development [Harlen (1985), Chapters 1 to 7]; includes practical investigations which emphasise learner preconceptions and investigation planning, data collecting and processing; and requires students to prepare lesson sequences revolving around Harlen's “shapes”, e.g. hypothesis generation (p.p. 166–172), then significant changes are anticipated.
KeywordsEducation Programme Preservice Teacher Teaching Strategy Structure Questionnaire Hypothesis Generation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- APPLETON, K. (1983) “Beginning student teachers' opinion about teaching primary science”.Research in Science Education, 13, 111–119.Google Scholar
- BURNS, J.C., WISE, K.C. AND OKEY, J.R. (April, 1983) “Development of an integrated science process skills test”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
- DILLASHAW, F. AND OKEY, J. (1980). “Test of the integrated process skills for secondary science students”.Science Education, 64, 601–608.Google Scholar
- HARLEN, W. (1985) Teaching and learning primary science. London, Harper.Google Scholar
- PENICK, J.E. AND YAGER, R.E. (1983) “The search for excellence in science education”.Phi Delta Kappan, 621–623.Google Scholar
- SCHARMANN, L., HARTY, H. AND HOLLAND, J. (1986) “Development and partial validation of an instrument to examine preservice elementary teachers' process orientation to science”.Science Education, 70 (4), 375–387.Google Scholar
- STRAWITZ, B.M. AND MALONE, M.R. (1987) “Peservice teachers' acquisition and retention of integrated science process skills: a comparison of teacher-directed and self-instructional strategies:Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 53–60.Google Scholar
- TISHER, R. (1986) “New directions for Australian research on science teacher education.Research in Science Education, 16, 125–134.Google Scholar
- TOBIN, K. AND GARNETT, P.J. (1984) “Reasoning ability of preservice primary teachers: implications for science teaching”The Australian Journal of Education, 28 (1), 89–98.Google Scholar
- ZEITLER, W.R. (1984). “Science backgrounds, conceptions of purposes, and concerns of preservice teachers about teaching science”.Science Education, 68 (4), 505–520.Google Scholar