Skip to main content
Log in

Teacher and student usage of science textbooks

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the differences between teachers' and students' perceptions of textbook usage in the science classroom. Four categories of use were identified: teacher directed student activities; teaching/studying guidance; as a source of information for the user and as preparation for assessment. The results of the study show that differences do occur between teachers and students with respect to their perceptions of the extent to which textbooks are used in the classroom and the purposes for which they are used, namely as a teaching/studying guide and as preparation for assessment. The findings of the study should be important to all those who use, write and publish high school science textbooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ade-Ridder, L. (1989). Textbook decisions: Making an informed choice.Family Relations, 38(2), 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E.L., Sethna, G.H. & Fillman, D.A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and exposing learning aids.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, H., Kahle, J.B. & Nordland, F.H. (1985). An investigation of high school textbooks as sources of misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching genetics.Science Education, 69(5), 707–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. & Tulip, D. (1992). The importance of selected textbook features to science teachers.Research in Science Teaching, 22, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B. (1988). How do classroom teachers use their textbooks?Journal of Reading, 31, 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, S.S. & Kyle, W.C. (1992). Textbook use and the biology education desired state.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, V.H., Rabinowitz, M. & Schieble, K.M. (1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly, 23(1), 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, A. & Taylor, B. (1966).Books and the teacher. London: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, S. & Michael, W.B. (1985).Handbook in research and evaluation. (2nd ed.) San Diego: Edits Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, K., Horsley, M., Young, C. & Downey, M. (1990).Textbook availability and usage in N.S.W. Non-government secondary schools, a report of the textbooks in N.S.W. Secondary schools project. Sydney: School of Teaching and Curriculum Studies, The University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C.F. (1981). What's the use of a textbook?Physics Education, 16, 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. & Stewart-Dore, N. (1987).Learning to learn from text: Effective reading in the content areas. Sydney: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muther, C. (1985). What every textbook evaluator should know.Education Leadership, 42(7), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston-Smith, H. (1993). An alternative model for textbook formation.Research in Science Education, 23, 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth K. & Anderson, C. (1988). In P. Ramsden (Ed.),Improving learning: New perspectives, London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruis, S.P. (1988). Something's wrong with chemistry textbooks.Journal of Chemical Education, 65, 720–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, D.L. & Wright, J.D. (1984, April). Biology teachers' preferences in textbook characteristics.Journal of Reading, 624–628.

  • Shymansky, J.A., Yore, L.D. & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers' beliefs about and perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulip, D. & Cook, A. (1991). A comparison of author intentions and student perceptions about textbook characteristics.Research in Science Education, 21, 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, M.K. & Haney, R.F. (1983). Analysis of concepts in an eighth grade science textbook.School Science and Mathematics, 83(3), 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. (1989), Skills and processes in science education: an introduction. In J. Wellington (Ed.)Skills and processes in science education: a critical analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (1988). Textbooks: Less than meets the eye.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6), 511–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L.D. (1991). Secondary science teachers' attitudes toward and beliefs about science reading and science textbooks.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: science education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tulip, D., Cook, A. Teacher and student usage of science textbooks. Research in Science Education 23, 302–307 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357074

Keywords

Navigation