Abstract
This paper examines the ideology of one the best known figures in science education in the USA, and draws attention to the relationship between the political climate and curriculum in national curriculum developments. We are mindful of the forces shaping the schooling of science in Australia, and we present this analysis as an example of the social forces that dominate education both here and overseas. Paramount is our desire to open the door for a socially responsible Australian school science experience.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldridge, B. G. (1992a). Project on Scope, Sequence, and Coordination: A new synthesis for improving science education,Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1, 1, 13–21.
Aldridge, B. G. (1992b). Essential changes in secondary science: Scope, Sequence, and Coordination. In M.K. Pearsall (ed.)Relevant Research. Washington: The National Science Teachers Association.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for all Americans. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Beardsley, T. (1992). Teaching real science,Scientific American, October, 98–108.
Bell, T.H. (1983).A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. Washington: National Commission on excellence in Education.
Bourdieu, J. & Passeron, J.P. (1977).Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Brotherton, T. et al. (undated).Station: E.A.R.T.H., Draft. Chariton: South Central Iowa Center.
Bush, G. (1990).Public papers of the President of the United States: George Bush, 1989, Books I & II. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
Bush, G. (1991a). America 2000. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
Cross, R.T., & Price, R.F. (1992).Teaching science for social responsibility. Sydney: St. Louis Press.
Crow, L. (1992).Fueling around Block V Eighth Grade. Houston: Baylor College of Medicine.
Crow, L. W., & Aldridge, B. G. (Undated). The National Project on Scope, Sequence and Coordination of Secondary School Science,School of Education Review, pp. 30–35.
Fensham, P. J. (1993). Academic influence on school science curricula,Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 1, 53–64.
Harms, N.C., & Yager, R.E. (Eds.) (1981).What research says to the science teacher, Volume 3. Washington: National Science Teachers Association.
Hurd, P. deH. (1992). ‘First in the world by 2000’: What does it mean?Education Week, Sept. 16.
Khodakov, Yu.V., Epstein, D.A., & Gloriozov, P. A. (1986).Neorganicheskaya Khimiya (Inorganic Chemistry) (Textbook for the 9th. Class of the Secondary School). Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
Lutz, M. (1993). NSTA/API Integrated Science Applications Institutes.Iowa's SS&C Newsletter, 3, (3), 5.
Matthews, M.R. (1992). Constructivism and the Empiricist Legacy in M.K. Pearsall (ed.)Relevant research Volume 2. Washington: The National Science Teachers Association, 183–196.
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1992).The content core: Volume I A guide for curriculum designers. Washington: The National Science Teachers Association.
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1993).NSTA reports. Washington: National Science Teachers association.
Pearsall, M.K. (Ed.), (1992).Relevant research Volume 2. Washington: The National Science Teachers Association.
Reagan, R. (1990).Public papers of the President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, 1988. Book 1. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.
Sauer, S.L. (Ed.), (1990).Science and technology and the changing world order. Colloquium proceedings. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Schwab, J.J. (1963).Biology teachers' handbook, (Biological Sciences Curriculum Study). New York: John Wiley.
Silberman, C.E. (1970).Crisis in the classroom: the remaking of American education. New York: Vintage Books.
Scope, Sequence and Coordination (SS&C). (1993).Update. Washington: SS&C Coordinating Center.
Sura, M.D. (1992). A handle on science.The New York Times, January 5.
Whitehead, A.N. (1933).Adventures of ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Social Responsibility of Science in Science Education Group.Specializations: sociology of science education, the nature of science and the production of scientific knowledge, comparative science education and environmental education.
Social Responsibility of Science in Science Education Group.Specializations: comparative education with particular reference to China, the nature of science and the production of scientific knowledge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cross, R.T., Price, R.F. “The approaching storm.” Ideology power and control: The national science teachers association curriculum development in the USA. Research in Science Education 23, 51–60 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357044
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357044