Skip to main content
Log in

Antitumoral action of bovine seminal ribonuclease

Definition of experimental parameters

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antitumor action of bovine seminal RNAase is studied as a function of the enzyme concentration and of the number of plated cells. With polyoma transformed hamster kidney cells, a 50% inhibition of cell growth is obtained with a 10 μg/ml of enzyme, while at this concentration growth of normal cells is very little affected. On the other hand the higher the number of plated cells, the lesser is the effect. The enzyme is found to be very effective also on tumor cells derived from a spontaneous tumor (neuroblastoma) and on cells derived from a chemically induced tumor (glioma). AmphoterycinB which is known to alter the permeability of eukariotic cells, does not affect the resistance of normal cells to the cytotoxic action of the enzyme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D'Alessio, G. & Leone, E., 1963. Biochem. J. 89: 7P.

  2. D'Alessio, G., Floridi, A., De Prisco, R., Pignero, A. & Leone, E., 1972. Eur. J. Biochem. 26: 153–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Donato, A. & D'Alessio, G., 1973. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 55: 919–928.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D'Alessio, G., Malorni, M. C. & Parente, A., 1975 Biochemistry, 14: 1116–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Libonati, M. & Floridi, A., 1969. Eur. J. Biochem. 8: 81–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taniguchi, T. & Libonati, M., 1974. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58: 280–286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matousek, J., 1973. Experientia 29: 858–859.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stanek, R. & Matousek, J., 1976. Fol. Biol. (Praha) 22: 33–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matousek, J. & Stanek, R. 1977. Fol. Biol. (Praha) 23: 56–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soucek, J. & Matousek, J., 1979. Fol. Biol. (Praha) 25: 142–144.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vescia, S., Tramontano, D., Augusti-Tocco, G. & D'Alessio, G.: 1980. Cancer Res. 40, 3740–3744.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marin, G. & Littlefield, J. W., 1968. J. Virol. 2: 69–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Benda, P., Lightbody, J., Sato, G., Levine, L. & Sweet, W., 1968. Science 161: 370–371.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Augusti-Tocco, G., Sato, G. H., Claude, P. & Potter, D. D., 1970. Symp. Int. Soc. Cell Biol. 9: 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kinsky, S. C., 1970. Ann. Rev. Pharmac. 10: 119–142.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hackett, A. J., Sylvester, S. S., Joss, V. R. & Calvin, M., 1972. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69: 3653–3654.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayflick, L., 1965. Exptl. Cell Res. 37: 614–636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vescia, S., Tramontano, D. Antitumoral action of bovine seminal ribonuclease. Mol Cell Biochem 36, 125–128 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357027

Keywords

Navigation