Abstract
The last fifteen years of research in science education has seen the emergence, flowering, proliferation, and now perhaps slight wilting of studies of pupils' alternative constructs. Meanwhile the older, broadly Piagetian, tradition of work rooted in notions of cognitive development was attacked as being, inter alia, deterministic, concentrating on what children could not do, and getting even that wrong since children could be shown to be a lot cleverer than the cognitive developmentalists claimed. The time has perhaps now come to look at these two lines of work together to see what assumptions they share and where their paradigms, aims, and methods differ significantly. In this paper I will claim that there is far less antagonism between the two traditions than is often represented, but that nevertheless the differences are fundamental and lead to different views of the purposes and potential of science education. Possible evidence that might be adduced in support of one view at the expense of the other will be considered and exemplified with recent results of a cognitive acceleration project.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adey P.S., Shayer M. & Yates C. (1989)Thinking science: the curriculum materials of the CASE project. London: Thomas Nelson
Adey, P.S. & Shayer M. (1992). An exploration of long-term far-transfer effects following an extended intervention programme in the high school science curriculum,Cognition and Instruction, in press
Ausubel D. (1968).Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston
Champagne A. B., Gunstone R.F., & Klopfer L. (1985). Effecting changes in cognitive structures amongst physics students. in L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (eds)Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Orlando: Academic Press
CLISP [Children's Learning in Science Project] (1987).Approaches to teaching. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
Driver, R. (1983).The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (eds) (1985)Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Gauld, C. F. (1986). Models, meters and memory.Research in Science Education, 16, 49–54.
Glaserfeld, E. von (1987).The construction of knowledge. Seaside CA: Intersystems Publications.
Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (eds) (1985)Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1958)The growth of logical thinking. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Karplus, R. 1979. Teaching for the development of reasoning. In A.E. Lawson (ed)The psychology of teaching for thinking and creativity. Columbus OH: ERIC-SMEAC.
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988).The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego: Academic Press.
Latour, B. & Woolgar S. (1973).Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverley Hills CA: Sage Publications.
Lawson, A.E. (1989). Research on advanced reasoning, concept acquisition, and a theory of instruction. In P.S. Adey, J. Bliss, J. Head, & M. Shayer, (eds)Adolescent development and school science. London: Falmer Press
Monk, M. (1990). A genetic epistemological analysis of data on children's ideas about DC electrical circuits.Research in Science and Technological Education.8 (2), 133–143.
Monk, M. (1991). Genetic epistemological notes on recent research into children's understanding of light.International Journal of Science Education 13 (3), 255–266.
Novak J. D. (1987). Human constructivism: towards a unity of psychological and epistemological meaning making. InProceedings of second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics education. Ithaca NY: Department of Education, Cornell University
Osborne R.J. (1981). Children's ideas about electric current.New Zealand Science Teacher.29, 12–19.
Osborne R.J. (1983). Towards modifying children's ideas about electric current.Research in Science and Technological Education.1, 73–82
Osborne R.J. & Freyberg, P. (1985).Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland: Heinemann.
Ramadas, J. & Driver, R. (1989).Aspects of secondary students' ideas about light. Leeds: Children's Learning in Science Project.
Ramadas, J. & Driver, R. (1991). Response to Martin Monk's paper, ‘Genetic epistemological notes on recent research into children's understanding of light.’International Journal of Science Education 13 (3), 266–268.
Shayer, M., Küchemann, D.E., & Wylam, H. (1976). The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children.British Journal of Educational Psychology. 46, 164–173
Shayer, M., & Wylam, H. (1978). The distribution of Piagetian stages of thinking in British middle and secondary school children. II 14- to 16- year olds and sex differentials.British Journal of Educational Psychology.48, 62–70
Shayer M. & Adey P.S. (1981).Towards a science of science teaching. London: Heinemann Educational.
Shipstone, D. M. (1984). A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple d.c. circuits.European Journal of Science Education.6 (2), 185–198.
Vygotsky L.S. (1978).Mind in society. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Specializations: cognitive development, curriculum development, in-service education, project evaluation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adey, P. Alternative constructs and cognitive development: Commonalities, divergences, and possibilities for evidence. Research in Science Education 22, 1–10 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356873
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356873