References
ARMBRUSTER, B. B. and ANDERSON, T. H. (1985). Producing ‘considerate’ expository text: or easy reading is damned hard writing.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 247–274.
BLANCE, A. (1984).School Chemistry in Victoria: Syllabus Prescription for Change. Unpublished M. Ed. thesis. University of Melbourne.
BROOKES, R., LEARMONTH, M. and THACKERAY, J. (1984).Chemistry for Year 11. Melbourne, Longman Cheshire.
EGAN, K. (1985). Teaching as story telling: A non-mechanistic approach to planning teaching.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 397–406.
ENTWISTLE, N. J. and DUCKWORTH, D. (1977). Choice of science courses in secondary school. Trends and explanations.Studies in Science Education, 4, 63–82.
GAULD, C. (1988). The “Pupil-As-Scientist” metaphor in science education.Research in Science Education,18.
KOOSTER, R. J. (1988). Value issues in consumer chemistry.Journal of Chemical Education, 65, 204–206.
McCONNELL, M. C. (1982). Teaching about science, technology and society at the secondary school level in the United States. An educational dilemma for the 1980's.Studies in Science Education, 9, 1–32.
MERTON, R. (1972). The Institutional Imperatives of Science. in BARNES, B.Sociology of Science, London, Penguin.
MILLAR, R. (1985). Training the mind: Continuity and change in the rhetoric of school science.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 369–382.
WERRY, R. J. (1989).A Cartoon Chemistry Text: The Construction and Testing of a Novel Chemistry Text Incorporating Human Values. Unpublished M. Ed. thesis. University of Melbourne.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Werry, R.J. Meaning and values from science texts. Research in Science Education 19, 300–310 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356870
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356870