Conclusion
Evidence collected so far seems to substantiate the contention that the constructivist approach to teaching has assisted students in their ability to interact with and internalize scientific concepts. The meanings attached to these concepts has become personalized in accordance with the learner's level of cognitive development. The question of intellectual growth is less decisive in the absence of more extensive long term studies.
From the teaching point of view this method is both interesting and rewarding, providing an opportunity to reflect on and evaluate a personalized construct for conceptual learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BIGGS, J.B. & COLLIS, K.F. (1982).Evaluating the quality of learning. The SOLO Taxomony. (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
DRIVER, R. & ERICKSON, G. (1983). Theories in action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science.Studies in Science Education 10, 37–60.
DRIVER, R. & OLDHAM, V. (1986). A constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science.Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.
GILBERT, J.K., OSBORNE, R.J. & FENSHAM, P.J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching.Science Education, 66 (4) 623–633.
OSBORNE, R.J. & GILBERT, J.K. (1980). A technique for exploring students' views of the world.Physics Education, 15 (6), 376–379.
ROGERS, C. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
SHAYER, M. (1989).Personal Communication.
SOLOMON, J. (1986). Children's Explanations.Oxford Review of Education, 12, 41–51.
TISHER, R.P. & DALE, L.G. (1978).The Understanding in Science Test, A.C.E.R. Publication.18, 71–82.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stanbridge, B. Some classroom applications of current ideas on conceptual learning in science. Research in Science Education 19, 268–277 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356866
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356866