Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 123–132 | Cite as

Development of an instrument for assessing the psychosocial environment of science laboratory classes

  • Geoffrey J Giddings
  • Barry J Fraser
Article

Conclusion

This paper attempts to stimulate and facilitate future research and practical applications involving the psychosocial environment of science laboratory classrooms by describing the development of a new instrument, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), which assesses eight dimensions of the actual and preferred environment of science laboratory classes at the upper secondary school and higher education levels. Comprehensive validation information reported here in tentatively attests to the internal consistency reliability and discriminant validity of the actual and preferred forms of the SLEI for use in Australian or American classrooms. As well, further analyses supported the ability of the actual form of the SLEI to differentiate between the perceptions of students in different classrooms. It is hoped that science teachers and other researchers will make use of the SLEI to pursue several research and practical applications analogous to those completed successfully in prior work in non-laboratory classrooms.

Keywords

High Education Internal Consistency Actual Form Science Teacher Prior Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. FRASER, B.J. (1981).Learning environment in curriculum evaluation: A review. Evaluation in Education series, Oxford, Pergamon.Google Scholar
  2. FRASER, B.J. (1982). Differences between student and teacher perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 511–519.Google Scholar
  3. FRASER, B.J. (1986a).Classroom environment. London, Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  4. FRASER, B.J. (1986b). Two decades of research on perceptions of classroom environment. In B.J. Fraser (Ed.)The study of learning environments. Salem, Oregon, Assessment Research.Google Scholar
  5. FRASER, B. (1989). Twenty years on classroom environment work: Progress and prospect.Journal of Curriculum Studies. (in press)Google Scholar
  6. FRASER, B.J. & FISHER, D.L. (1982). Predicting students' outcomes from their perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment.American Educational Research Journal, 19, 498–518.Google Scholar
  7. FRASER, B.J. & FISHER, D.L. (1986). Using short forms of classroom climate instruments to assess and improve classroom psychosocial environment.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 387–413.Google Scholar
  8. FRASER, B.J. & WALBERG, H.J. (Eds.) (in press).Classroom and school learning environment. London, Pergamon.Google Scholar
  9. GIDDINGS, G. & HOFSTEIN, A. (1980). Trends in the assessment of laboratory performance in high school science instruction.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 26(3), 57–64.Google Scholar
  10. HAERTEL, G.D., WALBERG, H.J. & HAERTEL, E.H. (1981). Socio-psychological environments and learning: A quantitative synthesis.British Educational Research Journal, 7, 27–36.Google Scholar
  11. HOFSTEIN, A. & LUNETTA, V. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected areas of research.Review of Educational Research, 52, 201–207.Google Scholar
  12. LUNETTA, V., HOFSTEIN, A. & GIDDINGS, G. (1981). Evaluating science laboratory skills.The Science Teacher, 48(1), 22–25.Google Scholar
  13. MOOS, R.H. (1974).The social climate scales: An overview Palo Alto, Calif., Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  14. MOOS, R.H. (1979).Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. PICKERING, M. (1980). Are lab courses a waste of time?The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19, 44–50.Google Scholar
  16. TRICKETT, E.J. (1978). Toward a social-ecological conception of adolescent socialization: Normative data on contrasting types of public school classrooms.Child Development, 49, 408–414.Google Scholar
  17. TRICKETT, E.J., TRICKETT, P.K., CASTRO, J.J. & SCHAFFNER, P. (1982). The independent school experience: Aspects of normative environments of single sex and coed schools.Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 374–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Science Education Research Association 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey J Giddings
  • Barry J Fraser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations