Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching, learning and the curriculum 1: The influence of content in science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

There are already a number of important criteria upon which topics for inclusion in science curricula should be selected and sequenced. We have recommended two additional criteria: the topic's potential for effecting conceptual change, and its potential for generating metacognitive training. Among other things, Science curricula should foster intellectual development. Such development is often a slow process of change, where new experiences, skills and understandings build on, modify and extend existing ones. Thus, topics should be evaluated in terms of their relation to existing Children's Science and to the students' metacognitive abilities. Evaluation of the appropriateness of a particular topic in a curriculum sequence should be based on such factors as its conceptual concreteness, the number and breadth of models which can be invoked, the concreteness of corroboration of results, and its predictive power. Conjointly, evaluation should take into account the nature, scope and complexity of the associated metacognitive demands. If selected carefully, topics in the science curriculum will do more than progressively sample the universe of content areas. They will develop each students ability and desire to engage in effective, independent learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BAIRD, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study.European Journal of Science Education, 8, (3), 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • BAIRD, J. R. & WHITE, R. T. (1982). Improving self-control of learning.Instructional Science, 11, 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERIKSON, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature.Science Education, 63, 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • MITCHELL, I. J., & BAIRD, J. R. (1985).A school-based, multi-faculty action research projects to encourage metacognitive behaaviour. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Science Education Research Association. Rockhampton.

  • NUSSBAUM, J. & NOVIK, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Towards a principled teaching strategy.Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OSBORNE, R. & FREYBERG, P. (1985).Learning in Science. Auckland, Heineman, 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, I., Baird, J. Teaching, learning and the curriculum 1: The influence of content in science. Research in Science Education 16, 141–149 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356828

Keywords

Navigation