Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selective cueing among chemistry teachers

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • FENSHAM, P.J. Challenges of the future for chemical education, inProceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Chemicals Education. Ed. W.T. Lippincott, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. 1981, 115–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • FENSHAM, P.J. Conceptions, misconceptions and alternative frameworks in chemical education.Chemical Society Reviews, 1984 (in press).

  • KARPLUS, R., LAWSON, A.E., WOLLMAN, W., APPEL, M., BERNOFF, R., HOWE, A., RUSCH, J.J., & SULLIVAN, F.Science teaching and the development of reasoning: A chemistry workshop. Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • KASS, H. & JENKINS, F. Developing chemistry curriculum materials. A multi-perspective approach. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers' Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1982.

  • NELSON, P.G. What is chemistry?Education in Chemistry, 1983,20(4), 122–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Peter Fensham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fensham, P. Selective cueing among chemistry teachers. Research in Science Education 14, 146–156 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356800

Keywords

Search

Navigation