Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 141–153 | Cite as

Cognitive preferences and chemistry achievement

  • Campbell J. McRobbie
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Keywords

Cognitive Preference Chemistry Achievement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AUSUBEL, D.P.Educational Psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. BLAKE, A.J. An examination of relationships between cognitive preferences, field-independence and level of intellectual development.Research in Science Education, 1976,6, 89–95.Google Scholar
  3. BRACHT, G.H., & GLASS, G.V. The external validity of experiments.American Educational Research Journal, 1968,5, 437–74.Google Scholar
  4. BROWN, A.L., CAMPIONE, J.C., & DAY, J.D. Learning to learn: On training students to learn from text.Educational Researcher, 1981,10(2), 14–21.Google Scholar
  5. COHEN, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960,20, 37–46.Google Scholar
  6. CRONBACH, L.J., & SNOW, R.E.Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. DEKKERS, J., & JOHNSTON, T. Cognitive preference and cognitive style: Their utilisation in the design of learning experiences in science instruction for nurses.Research in Science Education, 1980,10, 61–68.Google Scholar
  8. GUNSTONE, R.F. Word association and the description of cognitive structure.Research in Science Education, 1980,10, 45–53.Google Scholar
  9. HEATH, R.W. Curriculum, cognition and educational measurement.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964,24, 239–53.Google Scholar
  10. HUNT, D.E. Person-environment interaction: A challenge found wanting before it was tried.Review of Educational Research, 1975,45, 209–30.Google Scholar
  11. KEMPA, R.F., & DUBE, G.E. Cognitive preference orientations in students of chemistry.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,43, 279–88.Google Scholar
  12. KEPPEL, G.Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1973, 379.Google Scholar
  13. KERLINGER, F.N.Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973, 368.Google Scholar
  14. LORD, F.M. Elementary models for measuring change. In C.W. Harris (Ed.),Problems in measuring change. Wisconsin: University of Winconsin Press, 1963, 21–38.Google Scholar
  15. LUCAS, K.B. ‘Cognitive structure changes in astronomy students using advance organisers matched with cognitive style’. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1978.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979,39, 4167-A.Google Scholar
  16. MACKAY, L.D. ‘Cognitive preferences and achievement in physics’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, 1971.Google Scholar
  17. McNAUGHT, C. Relationship between cognitive preferences and achievement in chemistry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1982,19(2), 177–86.Google Scholar
  18. McROBBIE, C.J. ‘Cognitive preferences and chemistry learning’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, 1982.Google Scholar
  19. MESSICK, S. Potential uses of noncognitive measurement in education.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979,71, 281–92.Google Scholar
  20. NOVAK, J.D. (ed.).Teacher handbook for the ‘Learning How to Learn Program’. Ithaca: Cornell University, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. PINLS, A.L., & LEITH, S. What is concept learning in science? Theory, recent research and some teaching suggestions.The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 1981,27(3), 15–20.Google Scholar
  22. SIEGEL, L., & SIEGEL, L.C. Educational set: A determinant of acquisition.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 1–12.Google Scholar
  23. SNOW, R.E. Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching.Review of Educational Research, 1974,44, 265–91.Google Scholar
  24. STEWART, J.H. Content and cognitive structure: Critique of assessment and representation techniques used by science education researchers.Science Education, 1979,63, 395–405.Google Scholar
  25. TAMIR, P. The relationship among cognitive preference, school environment, teachers' curricular bias, curriculum, and subject matter.American Educational Research Journal, 1975,12, 235–64.Google Scholar
  26. TAMIR, P., & YAMAMOTO, K. The effects of junior high ‘FAST’ program on student achievement and preferences in high school biology.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1977,3(1), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. THEOBALD, J.H. ‘Attitudes and achievement in biology: An investigation of the effects of student attitudes and teaching styles on attitudes and achievement in secondary school biology’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. WILLIAMS, C. A study of cognitive preferences.Journal of Experimental Education, 1975,43(3), 61–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Science Education Research Association 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Campbell J. McRobbie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations