Abstract
Traditional learning environment research in science classrooms has been built on survey methods meant to measure students' and teachers' perceptions of variables used to define the learning environment. This research has led mainly to descriptions of learning environments. We argue that learning environment research should play a transformative role in science classrooms; that learning environment research should take into account contemporary post-positivist ways of thinking about learning and teaching to assist students and teachers to construct a more emancipatory learning environment. In particular, we argue that a critical perspective could lead to research playing a larger role in the transformation of science classroom learning environments. This argument is supplemented with an example from a middle school science classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, G. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current status, and new directions.Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 249–270.
Bentley, M. L., & Garrison, J. W. (1991). The role of philosophy of science in science teacher education.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2, 67–71.
Ewert, G. D. (1991). Habermas and education: A comprehensive overview of the influence of Habermas in educational literature.Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 345–378.
Freire, P. (1971).Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
Glasersfeld, E. von (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23–38). Washington DC: AAAS Press.
Grundy, S. (1987).Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: Falmer Press.
Habermas, J. (1971).Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
Hurd, P. D. (1994). New minds for a new age: Prologue to modernising the science curriculum.Science Education, 78(1), 103–116.
Johnson, M. (1987).The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987).Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lorsbach, A. (1991). Control as an impediment to the learning environment. In D. L. Fisher (Ed.),The study of learning environments (Vol. 6). Launceston, Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
Marshall, H. (1990). Beyond the workplace metaphor: The classroom as a learning setting.Theory into Practice, 29(2), 94–101.
Solomon, J. (1988).The signs of our time. Semiotics: The hidden messages of environment, objects and cultural images. New York: Harper and Row.
Tobin, K. (Ed.), (1993).The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington DC: AAAS Press.
Tobin, K. (1990a). Changing metaphors and beliefs: A master switch for teaching.Theory into Practice, 29(2), 122–127.
Tobin, K. (1990b). Teacher mind frames and science learning. In K. Tobin, J. B. Kahle, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.),Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with high level cognitive learning in science. London: Falmer Press.
Tobin, K., Kahle, J. B., & Fraser, B. J. (1990).Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with high level cognitive learning in science. London: Falmer Press.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J., & Hook, K. S. (in press). Referents for changing a science curriculum: A case study of one teacher's change in beliefs.Science & Education.
Young, R. (1990).A critical theory of education: Habermas and our children's future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorsbach, A., Tobin, K. Toward a critical approach to the study of learning environments in science classrooms. Research in Science Education 25, 19–32 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356457
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356457