Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perspectives on science in school: Agriculturalists and elementary teachers in dialogue

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many elementary teachers do not know or interact with individuals whose occupations rest on knowledge of the concepts of science. Community partnerships between the education, industrial and business sectors are being advocated and supported as strategies for dealing with the decontextualisation of science in classrooms. This paper describes a project in which a series of discussions was held between a small group of agriculturalists and a small group of elementary teachers. The intent of the discussions was to provide an opportunity for the participants to examine the ways in which science is developed and used in an occupational context integral to the community. Data derived from the transcripts of dialogue between the agriculturalists and teachers and from transcripts of interviews with each participant are interpreted to characterise the participants' images of science and their perspectives on science in school. The potential for this nontraditional form of professional development is discussed in light of these perspectives and the nature of the dialogue. In this paper, we describe a project which adopted a nontraditional approach to professional development in science for elementary teachers. The intent is to examine the conditions which facilitate collaborative development of science literacy through discussions between a group of teachers and representatives of the agricultural sector of the community. We examine the views of science and school science expressed by participants and consider the potential contribution of the dialogue between the teachers and agriculturalists to developing a view of science as human activity in everyday situations and occupations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, I., Jones, R., Pomeranz, K., & Symington, D. (1995). Collaboration between industry, higher education, and higher education systems in teacher professional development.International Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1977).Communication and learning in small groups. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform.Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A. M. (1992). What teachers can learn from industry partnerships.Education Leadership, 49(6), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. E. (1986). The cultures of teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 505–526). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, K. (1991). Making sense of science-the CHATTS project.Primary Science Review, 21, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1992). Cultures of teaching: A focus for change. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.),Understanding teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, E. P., & Robottom, I. M. (1990). The science-technology-society movement in science education: A critique of the reform process.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(6), 575–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (1986).Curriculum theorising: Beyond reproduction. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1991). Science education and praxis: The relationship of school science to practical action.Studies in Science Education, 19, 43–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993).Inarticulate, science. Nafferton: Studies in Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development.Phi, Delta Kappan, 76(8), 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1993). Beneath the skin and between the ears: A case study in the politics of representation. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.),Understanding practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nias, J. (1989).Primary teachers talking. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, T. (1991). Rethinking teachers and teacher education in science.Studies in Science Education, 19, 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I. (1973). Conventional classrooms, open classrooms, and the technology of teaching.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 5(2), 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E., & Hofstein, A. (1986). Features of a quality curriculum for school science.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Elementary Education, University of Alberta, 551, Education South, T6G 2G5, Edmonton, AB, Canada

    Patricia M. Rowell & Sandra Guilbert

Authors
  1. Patricia M. Rowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra Guilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia M. Rowell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowell, P.M., Guilbert, S. Perspectives on science in school: Agriculturalists and elementary teachers in dialogue. Research in Science Education 26, 187–203 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356431

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356431

Keywords

Search

Navigation