Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 208–216 | Cite as

Diagram prediction and higher order structures in mental representation

  • Richard Lowe
Article

Abstract

Predictions of the patterns likely to appear on a weather map diagram one day later than those shown on a given map were drawn by meteorologists and non-meteorologists. Differences in secondary structures of the predicted patterns with respect to the spacing and alignment of graphic elements were consistent with the existence of fundamental differences in mental representation between the subject groups. Lack of expertise in the subject domain of the diagram was associated with the production of patterns containing meteorologically-arbitrary arrangements of graphic elements. It is suggested that science instruction should include explicit consideration of the higher order structures present in diagrams.

Keywords

Secondary Structure Science Instruction Mental Representation Fundamental Difference Subject Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akin, O. (1986).Psychology of architectural design. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  2. Blystone, R.V., & Dettling, B.C. (1990). Visual literacy in science textbooks. In M. Budd Rowe (Ed.),What research says to the science teacher—The process of knowing: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
  3. Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M.J. (1988).The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Constable, H., Campbell, R., & Brown, R. (1988). Sectional drawings from science books: An experimental investigation into pupils' understanding.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 89–102.Google Scholar
  5. Deakin, J.M., & Allard, F. (1991). Skilled memory in expert figure skaters.Memory & Cognition, 19, 709–716.Google Scholar
  6. Egan, D.E., & Schwartz, B.J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings.Memory & Cognition, 7, 149–158.Google Scholar
  7. Hegarty, M., & Just, M.A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams.Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kindfield, A.C.H. (1993). Biology diagrams: Tools to think with.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 1–36.Google Scholar
  9. Lowe, R.K. (1988a). ‘Reading’ scientific diagrams: Characterising components of skilled performance.Research in Science Education, 18, 112–122.Google Scholar
  10. Lowe, R.K. (1988b). Drawing comparisons: School science and professional science.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 33(4), 32–39.Google Scholar
  11. Lowe, R.K. (1989). Search strategies and inference in the exploration of scientific diagrams.Educational Psychology, 9(1), 27–44.Google Scholar
  12. Lowe, R.K. (1993a).Successful instructional diagrams. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  13. Lowe, R.K. (1993b). Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram.Learning and Instruction, 3(3), 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowe, R.K. (1994, June).Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram. Paper presented at the Construction of Knowledge in Verbal and Pictorial Environments Conference, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  15. Lowe, R.K. (in press). Selectivity in diagrams: Reading beyond the lines.Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
  16. Schnotz, W., & Kulhavy, R. (in press).Comprehension of graphics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Willows, D.M. & Houghton, H.A. (Eds.) (1987).The psychology of illustration: Volume 1. Basic research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Winn, W.D. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams.Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Winn, W.D. (1993). An account of how readers search for information in diagrams.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(2), 162–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Science Education Research Association 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Lowe
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationCurtin University of TechnologyBentley

Personalised recommendations