Skip to main content
Log in

Subject competency of teachers and level of dependence on resource packs to teach levers, gears and pulleys

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This pilot study set out to ascertain whether the level of dependence on resource material is related to teaching experience, existing understanding in mechanics, and perceived self confidence in science and technology. Details of teaching experience and qualifications were obtained from 11 experienced teachers and 10 initial teacher trainees, and understanding of mechanics was assessed by a written test. Each teacher worked through one commercially produced inservice pack about levers, pulleys or gears, and then prepared a 30 minute session for 4 ten year old children. Videos of the sessions were analysed with respect to the extent to which the pack was the sole focus; the amount of integration with other teaching aids and approaches; and the extent individual children's needs were satisfied. Although science qualifications influenced teacher confidence, they were not accurate predictors of relevant knowledge and teaching competence. As the majority of teachers followed pack instructions closely, the children's needs were not always well matched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association for Science Education (1992).ASE policy: Present and future. Hatfield: ASE

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L.R. & Shinn-Taylor, C. (1988). Competency and expertise in primary school music and science: a survey of five schools in North East England.Curriculum, 9(1), 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, S., Galton, M., Hargreaves, L. & Harlen, W. (1990).Assessing science in the primary classroom: Observing activities. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid, G.W., Ball, D.L., & Anderson, C.A. (1988). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M.C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, D.P. (1992). Children doing science: Observation, investigation and the national curriculum for England and Wales.Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(2&3), 65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Y. (1993). Stability and change in teacher expertise.Teacher and Teacher Education 9(2), 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Harlen, W. (1990).Assessing science in the primary classroom: Practical tasks. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M., Harlen, W., Hargreaves, L., & Russell, T. (1990).Assessing science in the primary classroom: Written tasks. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Report (1985).Improving primary schools London: I.L.E.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wragg, E.C., Bennett, N. & Carre, C. (1989). Primary teachers and the national curriculum.Research Papers in Education, 4(3), 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: primary science and technology, teacher education.

Specialisations: science education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jarvis, T., Cavendish, S. Subject competency of teachers and level of dependence on resource packs to teach levers, gears and pulleys. Research in Science Education 24, 166–172 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356341

Keywords

Navigation