Abstract
Technology education and science education are seen to be related in a particular fashion by many science educators, a relationship exemplified by the common pairing of the two areas in labels such as “Science-Technology-Society” and “Science and Technology Curriculum”. At the heart of this common science education perspective is a view of technology education as dependent on and subservient to science education. In this paper engineering, often seen by scientists as a form of applied science dependent on and subservient to science, is considered. An analysis of the arguments that engineering, far from being an applied science, is a unique way of knowing (that engineering has a unique epistemology) is used to consider the technology education view of the relationships between science education and technology education. It is suggested that science educators need to rethink their perceptions of this relationship if they are to understand the arguments of technology educators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Corrigan, D. (1993, December).Ways ahead in science, technology and education. Invited paper given at the annual conference of the Science Teachers Association of Victoria, Melbourne.
Fensham, P.J. (1988). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education.International Journal of Science Education, 10, 346–356.
Fensham, P.J. (1990). What will science education do about technology education?Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36(3), 8–21.
Fensham, P.J. (1992). Science and technology. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.)Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Ferguson, E.S. (1992).Engineering and the mind's eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gardner, P.L. (1992). The application of science to technology.Research in Science Education, 22, 140–148.
Gardner, P.L. (1993). Science, technology and society: Some philosphical reflections on a Grade 11 course.Journal of Education Thought, 27, 273–300.
Goldman, S.L. (1990). Philosophy, engineering and western culture. In P.T. Durbin (Ed.),Broad and narrow interpretations of philosophy of technology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Goodman, P., (1970).The new reformation: Notes of a neolithic conservative. New York: Random House.
Holman, J. (1986).Science and Technology in Society (SATIS project.): General quide for teachers. Hatfield, U.K.: Association for Science Education.
Jones, A. & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of technology education: Implications for curriculum innovation.Research in Science Education, 22, 230–239.
Layton, E. (1974). Technology as knowledge.Technology and Culture, 15, 31–41.
Maruff, E., & Clarkson, P. (1988).The technology studies framework: P-10. Melbourne: Ministry of Education.
Norman, E. (1993). Science for design.Physics Education, 28, 301–306.
Scriven, M. (1987).The rights of technology in education: The need for consciousness raising. Paper prepared for the Education and Technology Task Force. Ministry of Education and Technology, South Australia.
Vincenti, W.G. (1990).What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
Waldrop, M.M. (1989). Flying the electric skies.Science, 244, 1532–1534.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Specializations: science education, teacher education.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gunstone, R. Technology education and science education: Engineering as a case study of relationships. Research in Science Education 24, 129–136 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356337
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356337