Abstract
Fifteen first-year nursing students individually took part in structured interviews in which a range of devices related to nursing practice and fluid physics was considered. Analysis of the transcripts of these interviews revealed that although respondents had already completed the section of their course related to fluid physics, the majority still exhibited inconsistent and naive ideas about the fluid state, pressure and fluid flow. After structured intervention however, some responses in the latter portion of the interviews gave evidence of conceptual development and an increasing ability to generalise physical principles in contexts not previously encountered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cree, L., & Rischmiller, M. (1991).Science in nursing. (3rd ed.) Sydney: W.B. Saunders.
de Berg, K. (1992). Students' thinking in relation to pressure-volume changes of a fixed amount of air: the semi-quantitative context.International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 295–303.
Driver, R. (1981). Pupils alternative frameworks in science.European Journal of Science Education, 3, 93–101.
Driver, R. (1990).Constructivist approaches to science teaching. Unpublished paper presente d at the Seminar Series ‘Constructivism in Education’, University of Georgia.
Engel-Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). What do children understand about pressure in fluids?Research in Science and Technological Education, 3(2), 133–144.
Fensham, P. (1993). Commonsense knowledge: a challenge to research.Australian Educational Researcher, 20(1), 1–19.
Mayer, R. (1983).Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Robards, K., & Welch, M. (1991).Science for health professionals. Sydney: Harper Educational.
Sere, M. (1982). A study of some frameworks used by pupils aged 11 to 13 years in the interpretation of air pressure.European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 299–309.
Sere, M. (1985). The gaseous state. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Eds)Children's ideas in science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Stavy, R. (1990). Pupill's problems in understanding conservation of matter.International Journal of Science Education, 12(5), 501–512.
Tobin, K. (1987). A comparison of exemplary and non-exemplary teachers of science and mathematics. In K. Tobin & B. Fraser (Eds.)Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education. Perth: Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics.
Wolff, L., Weitzel, M., & Fuerst, E. (1979).Fundamentals of nursing. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.
Yager, R. (1991). The constructivist learning model: towards real reform in science education.The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Specializations: student attitudes to science, science and mathematics curriculum.
Specializations: physical and inorganic chemistry, chemical education, history and philosophy and science teaching.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greive, C., De Berg, K. An examination of the predictions and explanations of pre-service nurses across a range of contexts involving the same principles of fluid physics: A preliminary study. Research in Science Education 24, 112–120 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356335
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356335