Abstract
Several reviews on science education have lamented the lack of content knowledge of primary teachers and implied that improvements in this area would lead to better teaching and learning. Subject knowledge, however is a complex issue. What knowledge is required and how much? There is knowledge of the ‘content’ and the ‘processes’ of science. An elusive but essential third component has been described as syntactic (Grossman, Wilson & Shulman, 1989), experiential (Burnard, 1986) or personal knowledge. This paper argues that it is unrealistic to consider the implementation of pre-service primary science courses that will provide potential teachers with all the ‘knowledge’ that they will require to be an effective teacher of science. Science educators, can however, provide effective frameworks from which pre-service students can identify and develop their existing knowledge. If teachers of science have their knowledge of science set within a personal view of science the potential exists for their school science programs to be more comprehensive, dynamic, relevant and contemporary. One perspective that could provide this framework is that offered by ‘Science, Technology and Society’ (S-T-S).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science.Research in Science Education, 22, 11–19.
Aubusson, P., & Webb, C. (1992). Teacher beliefs about learning and teaching in primary science and technology.Research in Science Education, 22, 20–29.
Baird, J. (1988). Teachers in science education. In P. Fensham (ed.)Development and dilemmas in science education. London: The Falmer Press.
Barnes, H. (1989). Structuring knowledge for beginning teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Bell, B. (1988). Girls in science. In S. Middleton (ed.)Women and education in Aotearoa. Wellington: Allen and Unwin.
Bereiter, C. (1992). Referent-centred and problem-centred knowledge: elements of an educational epistemology.Interchange, 23 (4), 337–361.
Biddulph, F. & Osborne, R. (1984).Making sense of our world: an interactive teaching approach. Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Burnard, P. (1986). Experiential learning: some theoretical considerations.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 7 (2), 127–133.
Carre, C. & Bennett, N. (1993). Subject matter matters.Primary Science Review, 29, 11–13.
DEET (Department of Employment, Education and Training). (1989).Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teachers' practical knowledge.Science Education, 76(5), 493–506.
Fensham, P. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17 (4), 415–435.
Goodson, I. (1991). Studying curriculum: a social constructionist perspective. In I. Goodson, & R. Walker, (eds.)Biography, identity and schooling. London: Falmer Press.
Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M. & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Hardy, T. (1992). Adult experiences of science and technology in everyday life.Research in Science Education, 22, 178–187.
Jeans, B. & Farnsworth, I. (1992). Primary science education: views from 3 Australian states.Research in Science Education, 22, 214–223.
Kahle, J. B. (1988). Gender and Science Education II. In P. Fensham (ed.)Development and dilemmas in science education, London: The Falmer Press.
Kahle, J. B., Daniels, J. & Harding, J. (1987).Girls and Science and Technology. East Lansing: University of Michigan.
Kelly, A. (1985). The construction of masculine science.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 6(2), 133–153.
Kruger, C., Summers, M., & Palacio, D. (1990). INSET for primary science in the national curriculum in England and Wales: are the real needs of teachers perceived?Journal of Education for Teaching, 16(2), 133–146.
Linn, M. C. (1992). Science education reform; building on the research base.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (8), 821–840.
McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: subject-specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher, Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
Ministerial Task Group Reviewing Science and Technology Education. (1992).Charting the course, Wellington: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (1993).Science in the New Zealand Curriculum, Wellington: Learning Media.
O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Engaging teachers in emancipatory knowledge construction.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 336–346.
Osborne, R., & Freyberg, R. (1985).Learning in science: the implications of children's science, Auckland: Heinemann.
Peterson, R., & Treagust, D. (1992). Primary pre-service teachers pedagogical reasoning skills.Research in Science Education, 22, 323–330.
Roth, K. (1989). Science education: it's not enough to ‘do’ or ‘relate’.American Educator, 13 (4), 16–22.
Rovegno, I. (1992). Learning a new curricular approach: mechanism of knowledge acquisition in pre-service teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 253–264.
Russell, T., Bell, D., McGuidan, L., Qualter, A., Quinn, J., & Schilling, M. (1992). Teachers' conceptual understandings in science: needs and possibilities in the primary phase. In L.D. Newton, (ed.)Primary science: the challenge of the 1990s, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Skamp, K. (1991). Primary science and technology: how confident are teachers?Research in Science Education, 21, 290–299.
Solomon, J. (1988). The dilemma of science, technology and society education. In P. Fensham (ed.)Development and dilemmas in science education, London: Falmer Press.
Solomon, J. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.
Summers, M. & Kruger, C. (1994). A longitudinal study of a constructivist approach to improving primary school teachers' subject matter knowledge in science.Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 499–519.
Symington, D., & Hayes, D. (1989). What do you need to know to teach science in primary school?Research in Science Education, 19, 278–285.
Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (3), 263–268.
Waghorn, A. (1993).Theoretically informed teacher education: how student teachers develop theories of teaching. Unpublished MEd Thesis: University of Victoria, Wellington.
Whyte, J. (1986).Girls into science and technology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Zoller, U., Donn, S., & Wild, R. (1991). Teachers' beliefs and views on selected S-T-S topics.Science Education, 75(5), 541–561.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Specializations: science education, science curriculum development, issues for girls in science.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, R. Teaching science in primary schools: What knowledge do teachers need?. Research in Science Education 24, 31–40 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356326
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356326