Research in Science Education

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 31–40 | Cite as

Teaching science in primary schools: What knowledge do teachers need?

  • Robyn Baker
Article

Abstract

Several reviews on science education have lamented the lack of content knowledge of primary teachers and implied that improvements in this area would lead to better teaching and learning. Subject knowledge, however is a complex issue. What knowledge is required and how much? There is knowledge of the ‘content’ and the ‘processes’ of science. An elusive but essential third component has been described as syntactic (Grossman, Wilson & Shulman, 1989), experiential (Burnard, 1986) or personal knowledge. This paper argues that it is unrealistic to consider the implementation of pre-service primary science courses that will provide potential teachers with all the ‘knowledge’ that they will require to be an effective teacher of science. Science educators, can however, provide effective frameworks from which pre-service students can identify and develop their existing knowledge. If teachers of science have their knowledge of science set within a personal view of science the potential exists for their school science programs to be more comprehensive, dynamic, relevant and contemporary. One perspective that could provide this framework is that offered by ‘Science, Technology and Society’ (S-T-S).

Keywords

Primary School Science Education Content Knowledge School Science Complex Issue 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science.Research in Science Education, 22, 11–19.Google Scholar
  2. Aubusson, P., & Webb, C. (1992). Teacher beliefs about learning and teaching in primary science and technology.Research in Science Education, 22, 20–29.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, J. (1988). Teachers in science education. In P. Fensham (ed.)Development and dilemmas in science education. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, H. (1989). Structuring knowledge for beginning teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, B. (1988). Girls in science. In S. Middleton (ed.)Women and education in Aotearoa. Wellington: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Bereiter, C. (1992). Referent-centred and problem-centred knowledge: elements of an educational epistemology.Interchange, 23 (4), 337–361.Google Scholar
  7. Biddulph, F. & Osborne, R. (1984).Making sense of our world: an interactive teaching approach. Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  8. Burnard, P. (1986). Experiential learning: some theoretical considerations.International Journal of Lifelong Education, 7 (2), 127–133.Google Scholar
  9. Carre, C. & Bennett, N. (1993). Subject matter matters.Primary Science Review, 29, 11–13.Google Scholar
  10. DEET (Department of Employment, Education and Training). (1989).Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  11. Duffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teachers' practical knowledge.Science Education, 76(5), 493–506.Google Scholar
  12. Fensham, P. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17 (4), 415–435.Google Scholar
  13. Goodson, I. (1991). Studying curriculum: a social constructionist perspective. In I. Goodson, & R. Walker, (eds.)Biography, identity and schooling. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M. & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hardy, T. (1992). Adult experiences of science and technology in everyday life.Research in Science Education, 22, 178–187.Google Scholar
  16. Jeans, B. & Farnsworth, I. (1992). Primary science education: views from 3 Australian states.Research in Science Education, 22, 214–223.Google Scholar
  17. Kahle, J. B. (1988). Gender and Science Education II. In P. Fensham (ed.)Development and dilemmas in science education, London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kahle, J. B., Daniels, J. & Harding, J. (1987).Girls and Science and Technology. East Lansing: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, A. (1985). The construction of masculine science.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 6(2), 133–153.Google Scholar
  20. Kruger, C., Summers, M., & Palacio, D. (1990). INSET for primary science in the national curriculum in England and Wales: are the real needs of teachers perceived?Journal of Education for Teaching, 16(2), 133–146.Google Scholar
  21. Linn, M. C. (1992). Science education reform; building on the research base.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (8), 821–840.Google Scholar
  22. McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1989). Why staying one chapter ahead doesn't really work: subject-specific pedagogy. In M. C. Reynolds (ed.)Knowledge base for the beginning teacher, Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ministerial Task Group Reviewing Science and Technology Education. (1992).Charting the course, Wellington: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology, and Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Education. (1993).Science in the New Zealand Curriculum, Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  25. O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Engaging teachers in emancipatory knowledge construction.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 336–346.Google Scholar
  26. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, R. (1985).Learning in science: the implications of children's science, Auckland: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  27. Peterson, R., & Treagust, D. (1992). Primary pre-service teachers pedagogical reasoning skills.Research in Science Education, 22, 323–330.Google Scholar
  28. Roth, K. (1989). Science education: it's not enough to ‘do’ or ‘relate’.American Educator, 13 (4), 16–22.Google Scholar
  29. Rovegno, I. (1992). Learning a new curricular approach: mechanism of knowledge acquisition in pre-service teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Russell, T., Bell, D., McGuidan, L., Qualter, A., Quinn, J., & Schilling, M. (1992). Teachers' conceptual understandings in science: needs and possibilities in the primary phase. In L.D. Newton, (ed.)Primary science: the challenge of the 1990s, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  31. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Skamp, K. (1991). Primary science and technology: how confident are teachers?Research in Science Education, 21, 290–299.Google Scholar
  34. Solomon, J. (1988). The dilemma of science, technology and society education. In P. Fensham (ed.)Development and dilemmas in science education, London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  35. Solomon, J. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
  36. Summers, M. & Kruger, C. (1994). A longitudinal study of a constructivist approach to improving primary school teachers' subject matter knowledge in science.Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Symington, D., & Hayes, D. (1989). What do you need to know to teach science in primary school?Research in Science Education, 19, 278–285.Google Scholar
  38. Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators.Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (3), 263–268.Google Scholar
  39. Waghorn, A. (1993).Theoretically informed teacher education: how student teachers develop theories of teaching. Unpublished MEd Thesis: University of Victoria, Wellington.Google Scholar
  40. Whyte, J. (1986).Girls into science and technology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Zoller, U., Donn, S., & Wild, R. (1991). Teachers' beliefs and views on selected S-T-S topics.Science Education, 75(5), 541–561.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Science Education Research Association 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Wellington College of EducationWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations