Skip to main content
Log in

A critical view of urban literacy: A case study of successful high school english teachers

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of three successful urban-high-school literacy teachers were studied. The primary data were drawn from extended teacher interviews and journals and were triangulated by classroom observations; interviews with principals, parents, and students; and student demographics. Data were analyzed by means of a critical-interpretivist frame in which teachers participated in the creation and confirmation of descriptive “themes.” Findings supported previous research on the characteristics of successful teachers and extended them in several key ways: (1) Successful literacy teachers engage students in literacy practices that are both innovative and meaningful to the students; (2) the success of these teachers is tied to their level of commitment; and (3) level of commitment is related to perceived support from the educational system and voice in educational reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., and Wilkinson, I. (1985).Becoming a Nation of Readers. Washington, DC.: National Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1976).Learning from Teachers: A Developmental Perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989).The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method.Educational Researcher 17: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Hand-book of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (1989).Ethnography Step by Step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., and Zane, N. (1989). Bein' wrapped too tight: When low-income women drop out of school. In L. Weis, E. Farrar, and H.G. Petrie (Eds.),Dropouts from School: Issues, Dilemmas, and Solutions. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. G. (1990).Small Victories. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1988). Literacy and the pedagogy of voice and political empowerment.Educational Theory 38(1):61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1983). The solution is the risk: A reply to the report of the National Commission on Excellence in Education. Unpublished paper. University of Arizona.

  • Green, M. (1990). Ethical issues and research. Paper presented at The Ohio State University College of Education Research Retreat, November.

  • Hahn, A. (1987) Reaching out to America's droputs: What to do.Phi Delta Kappan 69, (4): 256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, M. R. (1980). Public school treatment of low-income children: Education for passivity.Urban Education 15: 279–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study.American Education Research Journal 27(2): 363–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (1991).Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis.Harvard Educational Review 36: 257–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1988). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies.Women's Studies International Forum 11: 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDill, E. L., Natriello, G., and Pallas, A. (1986). A population at risk: Potential consequence of tougher school standards for student dropouts.American Journal of Education 94: 135–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley, W., and Kamberelis, G. (1991). The personal, social, and political functions of young children's reading and writing. Paper presented at the 41st meeting of the National Reading Conference, Palm Springs, CA, December.

  • McLaren, P. (1989).Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, M. M. (1991). The plight of the at-risk teacher. Doctoral dissertation presented at The Ohio State University, Columbus.

  • McLean, M. M., and Rogers, T. (in preparation).The Dinner Parties: Reflections on Collaborative Theorizing.

  • Miller, S. E., Leinhardt, G., and Zigmond, N. (1988). Influencing engagement through accommodation: An ethnographic study of at-risk students.American Research Journal 25: 465–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E. P. (1979). Effective teaching in the urban high school.Urban Education 14: 161–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natriello, G., McDill, E. L., and Pallas, A. (1990).Schooling Disadvantaged Children: Racing against Catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallas, A., Natriello, G., and McDill, E. L. (1989). The changing nature of the disadvantaged population: Current dimensions and future trends.Educational Researcher 18: 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paprocka, R.(1989). Article inColumbus Monthly (September), pp. 16–22.

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T., and McLean, M. M. (1989). Characteristics of effective literacy teachers of at-risk adolescents. Funded proposal, The Ohio State University.

  • Rogers, T., and McLean, M. M. (Eds.). (1991). Theirs are voices we need to hear. Teaching literacy in urban high schools.Literacy Matters 3(2): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T., and McLean, M. M. (1993) Reading, writing and talking our way in: Building a literacy community in three high school classrooms. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC, December.

  • Saville-Troike, M. (1989).The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983).The Reflective Practitioners: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, P. (1989).Broken Promises: Reading Instruction in Twentieth-Century America. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. and Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior.Review of Educational Research 51: 455–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1991).The Tact of Teaching: The Meaning of Pedagogical Thoughtfulness. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willinsky, J. (1990).The New Literacy: Redefining Reading and Writing in the Schools. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (1986).Handbook on Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

She and Theresa Rogers coordinate the Urban Professional Partnership School, a professional development school aimed at preparing teachers for urban settings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, T., McLean, M.M. A critical view of urban literacy: A case study of successful high school english teachers. Urban Rev 26, 173–185 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354957

Keywords

Navigation