Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 25, Issue 1–4, pp 477–490 | Cite as

Measurements of nuclear magnetic moments by transient field techniques

  • K. -H. Speidel
Transient Hyperfine Fields


The intense transient magnetic fields have been applied tog-factor measurements of short-lived nuclear states. Significant data for discrete collective high-spin states in158Dy and in the actinides232Th and238U can be understood by the rotational alignment of valent neutrons and protons, respectively. Measurements on excited states of the self-conjugate nuclei20Ne and24Mg are discussed. The controversial smallg-factor of the20Ne(4+) state is particularly exciting since it contradicts all present theories.


Magnetic Field Thin Film Excited State Significant Data Present Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    F.S. Stephens and R.S. Simon, Nucl. Phys. A138(1972)257.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Forterre, J. Gerber, J.P. Vivien, M.B. Goldberg, K.-H. Speidel and P.N. Tandon, Phys. Rev. C11(1975)1976.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.L. Eberhardt, G. van Middelkoop, R.E. Horstman and H.A. Doubt, Phys. Lett. 56B (1975)329.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G.J. Kumbartzki, K. Hagemeyer, W. Knauer, G. Krösing, R. Kuhnen, V. Mertens, K.-H. Speidel, J. Gerber and W. Nagel, Hyp. Int. 7(1979)253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Seiler-Clark, D. Pelte, H. Emling, A. Balanda, H. Grein, E. Grosse, R. Kulessa, D. Schwalm, H.J. Wollersheim, M. Hass, G.J. Kumbartzki and K.-H. Speidel, Nucl. Phys. A399(1983)211.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Frauendorf, Phys. Lett. 100B(1981)219.ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Diebel, A.N. Mantri and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A345(1980)72.ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Häusser, H. Gräf, L. Grodzins, E. Jaeschke, V. Metag, D. Habs, D. Pelte, H. Emling, E. Grosse, R. Kulessa, D. Schwalm, R.S. Simon and J. Keinonen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48(1982)383.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, in:Nuclear Structure, Vol. II (Benjamin Inc., New York, 1975).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    E.M. Szanto de Toledo, H.V. Klapdor, M. Diebel, J. Fleckner and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(1979)622.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    P.C. Zalm, J.F.A. van Hienen and P.W.M. Glaudemans, Z. Phys. A287(1978)255.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. de-Shalit and I. Talmi, in:Nuclear Shell Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    K.-H. Speidel, P.N. Tandon, V. Mertens, W. Trölenberg, G.J. Kumbartzki, N. Ayres de Campos, M.B. Goldberg, J. Gerber and M. Toulemonde, Nucl. Phys. A378(1982) 130.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Szanto de Toledo, M. Schrader, G. Rosner, E.M. Szanto de Toledo and H.V. Klapdor, Phys. Lett. 78B(1978)58.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    K.-H. Speidel, V. Mertens, W. Trölenberg, M. Knopp, H. Neuburger, J. Gerber and K. Bharuth-Ram, Nucl. Phys. A403(1983)421.ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K.-H. Speidel, V. Mertens, W. Trölenberg, M. Knopp, H. Neuburger, K. Bharuth-Ram and J. Gerber, Z. Phys. A315(1984)319.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© J.C. Baltzer A.G., Scientific Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. -H. Speidel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Strahlen- und KernphysikUniversität BonnBonnFRG

Personalised recommendations