Skip to main content
Log in

Funding at-risk compensatory programs: An urban high school case study

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Texas urban high school with a 98 percent minority student enrollment was selected to conduct a micro-finance analysis on site-based at-risk per pupil costs. A process was developed to define site-based state compensatory education (SCE) and to account for all students receiving direct and indirect state compensatory education services. Program costs data were analyzed to develop a relationship between full-time equivalent (FTE) state categorical program costs and regular education program costs. At-risk student background characteristics were defined using a parent home survey, conducted with a sample of twenty at-risk students and twenty regular education students. The data revealed that 68 percent of the students exhibited one or more of the state-defined at-risk variables; the highest program costs produced the highest achievement: and based on student backgroud characteristics, all of the students, including regular funded students, were at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. W. (1986). Controlling the work of teachers. InTeachers and Texts. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A., Kelly, J. A., and Garms W. J. (1971). Dimensions of educational need for educational programs for the culturally deprived. InDimensions of Educational Need. Gainesville, FL: National Educational Finance Project, pp. 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, J.A., and Cardenas, B. (1977).Theory of Incompatibilities, a Conceptual Framework for Responding to the Educational Needs of Mexican American Children. San Antonio: Intercultural Development Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., and Tyack, D. (1988, 1989). Mismatch: Historical perspective on schools and students who don't fit them. Paper presented at conference on accelerating the education of at-risk students. Palo Alto: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office (1993). National School Lunch Program Participation and Cost.

  • Gordon, E. W., and Wilkerson, D. A. (1966).Compensatory Education for the Disadvantaged. New York: College Entrance Examination Board (1, 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M., Jund, and Orland. (1986). Poverty, achievement, and the distribution of compensatory education services. A paper presented at the conference on designs for compensatory education. Washington, DC.

  • Kirst, M. W., McLaughlin, M., and Massell, D. (1989). Berkeley, CA: Center for Educational Research at Stanford (PACE).

  • Levin, H. M. (1987). New schools for the disadvantaged. A paper presented for the Mid-Continental Regional Education Laboratory. Palo Alto.

  • Levin, H. M. (1989a). Economics of investment in educationally disadvantaged students.Effectiveness of Educational Resources 79: 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1989b). Accelerated schools for at-risk students. Proceedings of a conference on accelerating the education of at-risk students. Palo Alto: Stanford University, Center for Educational Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1990). Class lecture at the University of Houston Summer Seminar.

  • Natriello, G., McDill, E. L., and Pallas, A. M. (1990).Schooling Disadvantaged Children: Racing Against Catastrophe. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmiller, R. A., and Frohreich, L. E. (1986).Resource Utilization in Schools and Classrooms. Madison, WI: University Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E., and Madden, N. A. (1989).Instructional Strategies for Accelerating the Achievement of Students At-Risk. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Education Agency (1993).Pupil Accounting Fall Survey 1993. Austin.

  • Texas Eduction Agency, Child Nutrition Programs (1993).District Profile State Totals. Austin.

  • Texas Eduction Agency (1994a).Texas School Law Bulletin. St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Education Agency (1994b).Texas Administrative Code. St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Education Agency (1992).Texas Administrative Code. St. Paul: West Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States General Accounting Office (1993).School Age Demographics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., and W. J. (1987). Expenditures and size efficiencies of public school districts.Educational Researcher XVI.

  • White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement.Psychological Bulletin 91(3): 461–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyes, A. Funding at-risk compensatory programs: An urban high school case study. Urban Rev 27, 141–158 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354360

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354360

Keywords

Navigation