Skip to main content
Log in

Doing time—Killing time at school: An examination of the perceptions and allocations of time among teacher-defined at-risk students

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

“Doing time” is an expression that is generally associated with prisoners who are disconnected from society and find themselves counting the days and minutes until their release from prison. In many respects, at-risk students attending our nation's large, urban, inner-city middle and high schools also consider themselves as not being connected to school or society and to be “doing time” in the classroom. Qualitative and subjective impressions of doing time at school have become the theme of many movies, books, and research articles. This study extends this qualitative type of research by quantitatively framing time allocation preferences and temporal dominance characteristics for a large sample of teacher-perceived “at-risk” students at several large urban high school sites. A sample of normal attaining students at the same school site served as a comparison group. The findings of this research effort generally support other more qualitative studies and indicate that there are strong preferences in at-risk students toward nondirected time-consuming activities (i.e., hanging out, video games, watching TV, etc.) with low-directed to nondirected time preference ratios. Normal attaining students had the reverse pattern, i.e., higher-directed to nondirected time preference ratios and higher preferences toward directed time-consuming activities that might be associated with investments in the schooling process (homework, studying, personal development, etc.). Interpretation of the circles test, a projective psychological procedure for establishing temporal dominance for at-risk students, revealed a general lack of recognition and connectiveness between past, present, and future events in their life and weak temporal dominance or orientation toward the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baruch, E. Bn. (1985).The Perception of Time. Israel: Ben Gurion University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, E. Bn., Bruno, J., and Horn, L. (1987). Dimensions of time use attitudes among middle-high.SES Students' Social Behavior Personality 15: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, E. Bn. (1989). What time means to me.Florida ASCD Journal, spring, pp. 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinn, L., and Pike, G. (1989). Future time perspectives: Adolescents' predictions of their interpersonal lives in the future.Adolescence 14(94): 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongers, L. S. (1971). A developmental study of time perception and time perspective in three cultural groups. UCLA doctoral dissertation.

  • Bruno, J. E. (1989). Developing a professional standard of care for academic advisors.The Academic Athletic Journal 3: 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, L. (1993).Busy Bodies. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colarusso, C. A. (1988). The development of time sense in adolescence.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 43: 179–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colarusso, C. A. (1991). The development of time sense in young adulthood.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 46: 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, T. (1967). The circles test: An investigation of perceptions of temporal readiness and dominance.Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment 31(5): 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, T. (1975). The effect of sex role learning on symbolic representations of time.International Journal of Symbology 1: 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, T. (1976).Perceiving Time. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W. J. (1982).The Developmental Psychology of Time. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W. J. (1990).About Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. R., and Reklis, D. M. (1991, January 3). America's children: Economic perspectives and policy options.Science #255: 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. (1985). Chapter 7 in “Patterns of Time Use” edited by F. Thomas Juster and Frank P. Stafford, pp. 133–171, Time, Goods and Well Being, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979).The Culture of Narcissism. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J., Schade, J., Furo, L., Reichle, A., and Brinkman, C. (1989). Time orientation: Past, present, and future perceptions.Psychological Reports 64: 1199–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. (1977). The development of time concepts in young children: Reasoning about duration.Child Development 48: 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, P. (1993, July 9). Study links TV, music to teens' risky behavior.Chicago Sun Times, p. 20.

  • Metcalf, F. (1986).Dictionary of Modern Humorous Quotations. London: Penguin, p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, D. G. (1993). Diversity, early socialization, and temporal development: The dual perspective revisited.Social Work 25(1): 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1969).The Child's Conception of Time. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammsayer, T., and Lustnauer, S. (1989). Sex differences in time perception.Perception and Motor Skills 68(1): 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, T. (1961).The Lonely Crowd. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigdin, J. T. (1991, August 14). Managers who switch coasts must adapt to different approaches to the use of time.Wall Street Journal, p. B, col. 3.

  • Rimer, S. (1988, November 27). Women, jobs and childrenNew York Times, p. 1.

  • Roark, A. C. (1992, December 11). Study finds youth at risk, neglected and unoccupied.Los Angeles Times, p. 1.

  • Robinson, J. P. (1992, Summer). Television and leisure time: Yesterday, today, and (maybe) tomorrow.Public Opinion Quarterly 33: 210–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, E. (1989). Impact of attitudes towards a personal future on study motivation and work orientations of nonworking adolescents.Adolescence 24(93): 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, C. (1992). Survey forTime Magazine/CNN; Reported in Anastasia Touifexis: Our violent kids.Time Magazine, June 12, 1989, pp. 52, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, L. (1972). Age change in time perception in Native Americans, Mexican Americans, and Anglo Americans.Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology 7(1): 117–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheban, J. (1966). The Wisdom of Gibran: Aphorisms and Maxims. New York: Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (1989, February 27). Time is not on their side.Time Magazine, p. 74.

  • Tucker, R. (1992). What happens when the clock stops.Parabola Magazine 2: 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Franz, M. (1978).Time: Rhythm and Repose. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, J. (1991). Effect of boredom proneness on time perception.Psychological Reports 69: 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1994, August 15). Over cheating hearts.Time Magazine 144(7): 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G., and Gonzales, A. (1984). The times of your life.Psychology Today 18: 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruno, J.E. Doing time—Killing time at school: An examination of the perceptions and allocations of time among teacher-defined at-risk students. Urban Rev 27, 101–120 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354358

Keywords

Navigation