Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of government purchases on market performance in Australia

  • Articles
  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the role which federal, state and local governments can play as large buyers in influencing the behavior of sellers in markets. While the available data make it impossible to draw unambiguous conclusions, the evidence is consistent with the possibility that theAustralian Commonwealth (federal) Government has used its market position as a large buyer to encourage competitive behavior, especially in highly concentrated industries. The local preference buying policies of state and local governments, however, may have augmented the effects of market power. The results suggest strongly that omission of variables representing the buying side of markets will lead to misspecification of structure-performance models, and indicate that government purchases could at appropriate times be used in addition to antitrust action, in order to improve market performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, INTEGRATED ECONOMIC CENSUSES: 1968–69. INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION STATISTICS. DETAILS BY INDUSTRY CLASS. AUSTRALIA. (Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, INDUSTRY CONCENTRATION STATISTICS. MANUFACTURING CENSUS 1972–3. (Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics, MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS. DETAILS OF OPERATIONS BY INDUSTRY CLASS, AUSTRALIA. (Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, various issues).

  4. Brooks, D.G., “Buyer Concentration: A Forgotten Element in Market Structure Models”, INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 1, (No. 3, 1973), pp. 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buzzell, R.D., Gale, B.T. and Sultan, R.G.M., “Market Share — A Key to Profitability”, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 53, (January–February 1975), pp. 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll, S.L. and Scott, L.C., “The Modification of Industry Performance Through the Use of Government Monopsony Power”, INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 3, (No. 1, 1975), pp. 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clevenger, T.S. and Campbell, G.R., “Vertical Organization: A Neglected Element in Market Structure-Profit Models”, INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION REVIEW. 5, (No. 1, 1977), pp. 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guth, L.A., Schwartz, R.A. and Whitcomb, D.K., “The Use of Buyer Concentration Ratios in Tests of Oligopoly Models”, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, LVIII, (November 1976), pp. 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  9. —, “Buyer Concentration Ratios”, THE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, XXV, (June 1977), pp. 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Industries Assistance Commission, ANNUAL REPORT 1973–74 (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. —, ANNUAL REPORT 1980-81, (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joson, S.S., “Australian Government Procurement Policies”, in Webb, L.R. and Allan, R.H. (eds.), INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS. AUSTRALIAN STUDIES (George Allen and Unwin, Sydney, 1982), pp. 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lustgarten, S.H., “The Impact of Buyer Concentration in Manufacturing Industries”, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, LVII, (May 1975), pp. 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —, “The Use of Buyer Concentration Ratios in Tests of Oligopoly Models: Reply”, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, LVIII, (November 1976), pp. 492–494.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McGuckin, R. and Chen, H., “Interactions Between Buyer and Seller Concentration and Industry Price — Cost Margins”, INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 4, (No. 3, 1976), pp. 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M.E., “Consumer Behavior, Retailer Power and Market Performance in Consumer Goods Industries”, REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, LVI, (November 1974), pp. 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Round, D.K., “Countervailing Power and a Government Purchasing Commission: An Opportunity to Promote Increased Competition in Australian Industries”, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, XXXVI, (June 1977), pp. 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scherer, F.M., INDUSTRIAL MARKET STRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE, second edition (Rand McNally, Chicago, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stigler, G.J., “A Theory of Oligopoly”, JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 72, (February 1964), pp. 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, House of Representatives Standing Committee on Expenditure, COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT PURCHASING. REPORT (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Adelaide, USA

    David K. Round

Authors
  1. David K. Round
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

I am grateful to David Davies and John Hatch for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Round, D.K. The impact of government purchases on market performance in Australia. Rev Ind Organ 1, 94–113 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354346

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354346

Keywords

Search

Navigation