Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 257–272 | Cite as

Assessing the outcomes of parent-and provider-designed systems of care for children with emotional and behavioral disorders

  • Mary E. Evans
  • Mary I. Armstrong
  • Fiona Thompson
  • Jung-Kyu Lee
Article

Abstract

There is a paucity of research on the outcomes associated with involving parents of children with emotional and behavioral problems as partners with professionals in designing and implementing a system of care. This study examines the systems, child, and family outcomes associated with providing flexible funds to two counties, one engaged in strengthening its provider-designed system and the other in developing and implementing a parent-designed system. This article describes the qualitative, network, and treatment outcome studies comprising the research.

Keywords

Public Health Treatment Outcome Behavioral Problem Behavioral Disorder Family Outcome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stroul B, Friedman R: A system of care for severely emotionally disturbed children and youth. Washington, DC, CASSP Technical Assistance Center, Georgetown University Child Development Center, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Families First: Personal literature, 1990, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    New York State Department of Economic Development: Census of population and housing: Summary characteristics for New York State counties. Albany, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hennen F: Personal communication, May 26, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Institute of Mental Health: Research on children and adolescents with mental, behavioral and developmental disorders. Rockville, MD, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Office of Technology Assessment: Children's mental health: Problems and services. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sowder BJ, Burt MR, Rosenstein MJ et al.: Utilization of psychiatric facilities by children and youth. Bethesda, MD, Burt Associates, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knitzer J: Unclaimed children: The failure of public responsibility to children and adolescents in need of mental health services. Washington, DC, The Children's Defense Fund, 1982.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cournoyer DE, Johnson HC: Measuring parents' perceptions of mental health professionals. Research on Social Work Practice 1(4):399–415, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins B, Collins T: Parent-professional relationships in the treatment of seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents. Social Work 35(6):522–527, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friesen BJ, Koroloff NM: Family-centered services: Implications for mental health administration and research. Journal of Mental Health Administration 17(1):13–25, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turnbull HR, Garlow JE, Barber PA: A policy analysis of family support for families with members with disabilities. Kansas Law Review 39:739–815, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans M: Outcomes of parent and provider designed system of care. Albany: Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, New York State Office of Mental Health, NIMH/CMHS (5HD5SM40736), 1992.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riemer JW: Varieties of opportunistic research. Urban Life 5:467–477, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehan H: Understanding inequality in schools: The contribution of interpretive studies. Sociology of Education 65:1–20, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rose D: Patterns of American Culture. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwartzman HB: The ethnographic evaluation of human service programs. Anthropological Quarterly 56:179–189, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dorr-Bremme DW: Ethnographic evaluation: A theory and method. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 7(1):65–83, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burt R: Toward A Structural Theory of Action. New York, Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burt R: Range, in Applied Network Analysis. Edited by Burt R, Minor M. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 176–194, 1983.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Granovetter M: The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–80, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Granovetter M: Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481–510, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blau P: Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, Free Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coser L (Ed.). The idea of social structure: Essays in honor of Robert Merton. New York, Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich, 1975.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smelser N: Social structure, in Handbook of Sociology. Edited by Smelser N. Newbury, CA, Sage, 1988.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kadushin C: Social density and mental health, in Social Structure and Network Analysis. Edited by Marsden P and Lin N. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage, 1982.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee J: Organizational constraints, network matching, and the reemployment of displaced workers. Unpublished dissertation. University at Stony Brook, State University of New York, 1993.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wellman B: The structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance, in Social Structure: A Network Approach. Edited by Wellman B, Berkowitz S. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    White H, Boorman S, Breiger L: Social structure from multiple networks: I Block models of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology 81:730–780, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boorman S, White H: Social structure from multiple networks: II Role structures. American Journal of Sociology 81:1384–1446, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morrissey J, Tausig M, Lindsey M: Network analysis methods for mental health service system research: A comparison of two community support systems. Mental Health Service System Report, Series BN, No. 6, Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Romo F: Moral dynamics: A block model study of conflict in a mental institution. Unpublished dissertation, New Haven: Yale University, 1989.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anheire H, Romo P: The omega phenomenon: The social infrastructure, interpersonal choice, and the social periphery. New York, Russell Sage Foundation Working Paper #25. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Achenbach TM: Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 4–12 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry, 1991.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Olson DH, Portner J, Bell RQ: FACES II: Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. Family Social Science, St. Paul, University of Minnesota, 1982.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Snyder CR et al.: The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:570–585, 1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Piers EV: Manual for the Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary E. Evans
    • 1
  • Mary I. Armstrong
    • 1
  • Fiona Thompson
    • 1
  • Jung-Kyu Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Bureau of Evaluation and Services ResearchNew York State Office of Mental HealthAlbany

Personalised recommendations