A semicompartmental modeling approach for pharmacodynamic data assessment

  • Kenneth G. Kowalski
  • Aziz Karim
Article

Abstract

A new method is proposed for modeling the temporal aspects of the pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic relationship of drugs. A semicompartmental solution to the effect-site link model of Sheiner et al. (1) formed the basis for this new approach. This semicompartmental solution does not require the specification of a compartmental model for the pharmacokinetic response and may offer an advantage when model misspecification is present in using standard compartmental models. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the semicompartmental modeling approach. This method is easily implemented in standard nonlinear regression packages.

Key words

effect-site link model semicompartmental model model misspecification pharmacokinetics pharmacodynamics nonlinear regression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. B. Sheiner, D. R. Stanski, S. Vozeh, R. D. Miller, and J. Ham. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25:358–371 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. D. Unadkat, F. Bartha, and L. B. Sheiner. Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with nonparametric kinetic and dynamic models.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 40:86–93 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. H. G. Holford and L. B. Sheiner. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.Clin. Pharmacokin. 6:429–453 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. L. Page, J. M. Wharton, W. E. Wilkinson, I. M. Friedman, W. D. Claypool, A. Karim, K. G. Kowalski, S. J. McDonald, P. Gardiner, and E. L. C. Pritchett. Bidisomide (SC-40230), a new antiarrhythmic agent: initial study of tolerability and pharmacokinetics.Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 51:371–378 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    SAS Institute Inc.SAS/STAT User's Guide, Ver. 6, 4th ed., Vol. 2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989, pp. 1135–1193.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring, and A. J. McEwen. A package of computer programs for pharmacokinetic modeling.Biometrics 30:512–513 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. L. Beal, L. B. Sheiner, and A. J. Boeckmann.NONMEM User's Guide, Parts I–VI, NONMEM Project Group, University of California, San Francisco, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. H. G. Holford. A modelling tool for microcomputers-pharmacokinetic evaluation and comparison with standard computer programs.Clin. Exptl. Pharmacol. Physiol. Suppl. 9:95 (1985).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier.Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 419–424.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth G. Kowalski
    • 1
  • Aziz Karim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Clinical Data Management, Searle Research and DevelopmentSkokie
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability, Searle Research and DevelopmentSkokie

Personalised recommendations