Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The averch and Johnson analysis of public utility regulation twenty years later

  • Articles
  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Averch and Johnson model of a rate-of-return regulated firm seems to have captivated economists and focused their attention on modest technical inefficiency. Pricing distortions, which were revealed by Welliscz, and the incentive for more extreme technical distortions, which was described by Westfield, are not as widely considered or even understood twenty years after the articles appeared. Analysis using uncertainty and dynamic methods has also failed to treat the full range of rate-of-return implications. To do justice to these original contributions more effort is called for in designing new institutions of public utility regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Harvey Averch and Leland L. Johnson, “Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint,”American Economic Review, Vol. 52, December 1962, 1053–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth E. Bailey, “Peak-Load Pricing under Regulatory Constraint.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, July 1972, 662–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth E. Bailey,Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth E. Bailey and L. J. White, “Reversals in Peak and Off Peal: Prices,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 5, Spring 1974, 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • William J. Baumol, “Reasonable Rules for Rate Regulation: Plausible Policies for and Imperfect World,” in Almarin Phillips and Cliver E. Williamson, eds.,Prices: Issues in Theory Practice and Public Policy, Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • William J. Baumol and Alvin K. Klevorick, “Input Choices and Rate-of-Return Regulation: An Overview of the Discussion,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 1, Autum 1970, 162–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay S. Bawa and David S. Sibley, “Dynamic Behavior of a Firm Subject to Stochastic Regulatory Review,”International Economic Review, Vol. 21, October 1980, 627–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • James P. Bell, “Pricing by User Class: A Study of Electric Utility Costs and Price Discrimination under Regulation,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1978.

  • William Breit, “Some Early Unconventional Wisdom on Utility Regulation,”Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 50, March 1970, 859–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • William S. Comanor, “Should Natural Monopolies Be Regulated?,”Stanford Law Review, Vol. 22, February 1970, 510–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis Courville, “Regulation and Efficiency in the Electric Utility Industry,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 5, Spring 1974, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleidorfer, “Reliability and Public Utility Pricing,”American Economic Review, Vol. 68, March 1978, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael A. Crew and Paul R. KleindorferPublic Utility Economics, New York: Macmillan, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satya P. Das, “On the Effect of Rate of Return Regulation under Uncertainty,”American Economic Review, Vol. 70, June 1980, 456–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catherine C. Eckel, “Customer Class Pricing by Electric Utilities,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia, 1983.

  • Fredrick W. Jones,Input Biases under Rate of Return Regulation, New York: Garland Publishing, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin K. Klevorick, “The Graduated Fair Return: A Regulatory Proposal,”American Economic Review, Vol. 56, 1966, 477–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvin K. Klevorick, “The Behavior of a Firm Subject to Stochastic Regulatory Review,”Bell Journal of Economics and Managerial Science, Vol. 2, Spring 1971, 122–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert A. Mayer and Hayne E. Leland, “The Effectiveness of Price Regulation,”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 62, November 1980, 555–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco Modigliani and Merton H. Miller, “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment,”American Economic Review, Vol. 48, March 1958, 261–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Montogomery, “Judicinl Fair Return and the Price Level,”Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 12, 1931, 221–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter Prineaux and Randy A. Nelson, “An Examination of Price Discrimination and Internal Subsidization by Electric Utilities,”Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 47, July 1980, 84–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • David Sappington, “Strategic Firm Behavior under a Dynamic Regulatory Adjustment Process,”Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 11, Spring, 1980.

  • Frederick H. Scherer,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank Scott, “An Economic Analysis of Fuel Adjustment Clauses,” Ph.D. Dissertation University of Virginia, 1979.

  • Roger Sherman, “Financial Aspects of Rate-of-Return Regulation,”Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 44, October 1977, 240–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger Sherman, “Is Public Utility Regulation Beyond Hope?,” in Albert Danielsen and David Kamerschen, eds.,Current Issues in Public Utility Economics, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger Sherman and Michael Visscher, “Rate-of-Return Regulation and Two-Part Tariffs,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, February 1982, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etyan Sheshinski, “Welfare Aspects of a Regulatory Constraint: Note,”American Economic Review, Vol. 61, March 1971, 175–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert M. Spann, “Rate of Return Regulation and Two-Part Tariffs,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 96, February 1982, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etyan Sheshinski, “Welfare Aspects of a Regulatory Constraint: Note,”American Economic Review, Vol. 61, March 1971, 175–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert M. Spann, “Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: an Efficiency Test of the Averch-Johnson Thesis,”Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 5, Spring 1974, 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akira Takayama, “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint,”American Economic Review, Vol. 59, March 1969, 255–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester D. Taylor, “The Demand for Electricity: A Survey,”Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 6, Spring 1975, 74–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingo Vogelsang and Jorg Finsinger, “A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms,”Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, Spring 1979, 157–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard Waverman, “Peak-Load Pricing under Regulatory Constraint: A Proof of Inefficiency,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83, June 1975, 645–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanislaw H. Wellisz, “Regulation of Natural Gas Pipeline Companies: An Economic Analysis,”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 71, February 1963, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • John T. Wenders, “Peak Load Pricing in the Electric Utility Industry,”Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 7, Spring 1976, 323–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fred M. Westfield, “Regulation and Conspiracy,”American Economic Review, Vol. 55, June 1965, 424–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Robert Wichers, “The Graduated Fair Return: Comment,”American Economic Review, Vol. 61, September 1971, 725–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward E. Zajac, “A Geometric Treatment of Averch-Johnson's Behavior of the Firm Model,”American Economic Review, Vol. 60, March 1970, 117–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “Note on ‘Gold Plating’ or ‘Rate Base Padding’,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 3, Spring 1972, 311–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia, USA

    Roger Sherman (Professor of Economics)

Authors
  1. Roger Sherman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherman, R. The averch and Johnson analysis of public utility regulation twenty years later. Rev Ind Organ 2, 178–193 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354220

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354220

Keywords

Search

Navigation