Social participation and charitable giving: A multivariate analysis

  • Paul G. Schervish
  • John J. Havens


Despite an abundance of survey data on charitable giving, researchers have not analysed these data asking the kinds of theoretical questions and employing the kinds of multivariate statistical techniques that would advance our understanding of the social processes leading to charitable behaviour. This article reports the authors' first findings from their continuing efforts to develop and test such a multivariate causal model of the social, demographic, economic and motivational determinants of individual charitable giving. The first section outlines ouridentification theory of charitable giving. In the second section we discuss the data and how we operationalise our variables. The third section examines whether there is broad quantitative support for major tenets of the model developed if applied at the household level. In the fourth section we enquire about which factors are most strongly related to giving behaviour. We conclude with a discussion about the centrality of communities of participation for inducing charitable giving and about the practical implications for fundraising.


Multivariate Analysis Survey Data Statistical Technique Practical Implication Social Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, G.S. (1976).The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, J.S. (1990)Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetis.Google Scholar
  3. de Tocqueville, A. (1835/1966)Democracy in America (G. Lawrence, trans; J.P. Mayer, ed.), Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Gilleman, G.S.J. (1959).The Primacy of Charity in Moral Theology, The Newman Press, Westminster, Maryland.Google Scholar
  5. Hodgkinson, V.A., Weitzman, M.A. and Kirsch, A.D. (1988)From Belief to Commitment: The Activities and Finances of Religious Congregations in the United States, Independent Sector, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  6. Hodgkinson, V.A., Weitzman, M.S., Noga, S.M. and Gorski, H.A. (1992a)Volunteering and Giving Among American Teenagers 12 to 17 Years of Age, Independent Sector, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Hodgkinson, V.A., Weitzman, M.S., Noga, S.M. and Gorski, H.A. (1992b)Giving and Volunteering in the United States: 1992 Edition, Independent Sector, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Hornstein, H.A. (1972) Promotive tension: the basis of prosocial behavior from a Lewinian perspective,Journal of Social Issues, 28, 191–218.Google Scholar
  9. Hornstein, H.A. (1976)Cruelty and Kindness: A New Look at Aggression and Altruism, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, E.F., Bachmeier, M.D., Wood, J.R. and Craft, E.A. (1995) Volunteering and charitable giving: do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24, 59–78.Google Scholar
  11. Jencks, C. (1990) Varieties of altruism, in J.J. Mansbridge (ed.)Beyond Self-interest, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illionis.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, M.W. (1994)Virtuous Giving: Philanthropy, Voluntary Service, and Caring, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
  13. Ostrander, S. and Schervish, P.G. (1990) Giving and getting: philanthropy as a social relation, in J. Van Til (ed.)Critical Issues in American Philanthropy, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  14. Piliavin, J.A. and Charng, H.-W. (1990) Altruism: a review of recent theory and research,Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Piliavin, J.A., Dovidio, J.A., Gaertner, J.F. and Clark, S.L. (1981)Emergency Intervention, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Schervish, P.G. (1992) Adoption and altruism: those with whom I want to share a dream,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 4, Winter, 327–50.Google Scholar
  17. Schervish, P.G. (1993) Philosophy as moral identity of Caritas, in P.G. Schervish with O. Benz, P. Dulaney, T.B. Murphy and S. Salett (eds)Taking Giving Seriously, Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  18. Schervish, P.G. (1995) Gentle as doves and wise as serpents: the philosophy of care and the sociology of transmission, in P.G. Schervish, V.A. Hodgkinson and M. Gates (eds)Care and Community in Modern Society: Passing on the Tradition of Care to the Next Generation, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  19. Schervish, P.G. (forthcoming)The Modern Medicis: Strategies of Philanthropy among the Wealthy, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  20. Schervish, P.G. and Havens, J.J. (1995) Wherewithal and beneficence: charitable giving by income and wealth, in C.C. Hamilton and W.F. Ilchman (eds)Cultures of Giving II: How Heritage, Gender, Wealth, and Values Influence Philanthropy, Vol. 8 (Summer) ofNew Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 81–109.Google Scholar
  21. Schervish, P.G., Coutsoukis, P.E., and Lewis (1994)Gospels of Wealth: How the Rich Portray Their Lives, Prager, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  22. Simmons, R.G., Klein, S.D. and Simmons, R.L. (1977)The Gift of Life: The Social and Psychological Impact of Organ Transplantation, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Simmons, R.G., Marine, S.K. and Simmons, R.L. (1987)The Gift of Life: The Effect of Organ Transplantation on Individual Family and Societal Dynamics, Transaction Books, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Simmons, R.G. (1991) Presidential Address on Altruism and Sociology,The Sociological Quarterly, 32, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snow, D.A., Zurcher, L.A. and Ekland-Olson, S. (1980) Social networks and social movements: a microstructural approach to differential recruitment to cults and sects,American Sociological Review, 45, 787–801.Google Scholar
  26. Snow, D.A., Burke Rochford, E. Jr., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation,American Sociological Review, 51, 464–81.Google Scholar
  27. Staub, E. (1978)Positive Social Behavior and Morality: Social and Personal Influences, volume 1, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Titmuss, R.M. (1971)The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy, Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research (ISTR) 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul G. Schervish
    • 1
  • John J. Havens
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Welfare Research Institute at Boston CollegeChestnut Hill
  2. 2.Social Welfare Research Institute at Boston CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations