Abstract
Non-profit industrial development organisations (NIDOs) represent a common but little studied community response to widespread deindustrialisation in the United States. These non-profits are organised as chartered not-for-profit corporations, public authorities or agencies of local government. Most receive at least some public funding to promote local industrial development. Thus, a key issue is how accountable NIDOs are to the public they have been created to serve. Data from national surveys of NIDO executive directors in 1984 and 1994, as well as a survey of six case study boards of directors, suggest that public accountability is an increasingly important concern among NIDOs. Public hearings, efforts to diversify the boards in terms of gender and race, and connections to community development corporations and other local organisations are among the ways NIDOs attempt to be accountable to the general public. Although few women or racial minorities serve on NIDO boards, those boards with representation of these groups tend to be more concerned with public accountability. Boards containing public officials tend to be less concerned, presumably because their presence makes the NIDOs more directly accountable as a result of the participation of elected public representatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cox, K.R. and Mair, A. (1988) Locality and community in the politics of local economic development,Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 307–25.
Dillman, D.A. (1978).Mail and Telephones Surveys: The Total Design Method, John Wiley, New York.
Eisinger, P.K. (1988)The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Development Policy in the United States, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
Erickson, R.A., Humphrey, C.R. and Ottensmeyer, E.J. (1987)Not-For-Profit Local Industrial Development Groups: Their Organization, Strategic Activities, and Effectiveness, final report to the Economic Development Administration, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Fleischmann, A. and Feagin, J.R. (1987) The politics of growth-oriented urban alliances: comparing old industrial and new sunbelt cities.Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 207–32.
Fosler, R.S. (ed.) (1988)The New Economic Role of American States: Strategies in a Competitive World Economy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Fosler, R.S. and Berger, R.A. (eds) (1982)Public-Private Partnerships in American Cities, D.C. Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Harrison, B. and Bluestone, B. (1988)The Great U-Turn: Restructuring and the Polarization of America, Basic Books, New York.
Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism,Geografiska Annaler, 71B, 3–17.
Humphrey, C.R. and Erickson, R.A. (1993) Industrial development groups, local dependence, and the community growth machine, in R.P. McGowan and E.J. Ottensmeyer (eds)Economic Development Strategies for State and Local Government, Nelson Hall, Chicago, Illinois.
Humphrey, C.R. and Erickson, R.A. (1995)Nonprofit Industrial Development Organizations′ Accountability and Distributional Effects, final report to the Nonprofit Sector Research Fund, The Aspen Institute.
Humphrey, C.R., Erickson, R.A. and Ottensmeyer, E.J. (1988) Industrial development groups, organizational resources, and the prospects for effecting growth in local economies,Growth and Change, 19, 1–21.
Humphrey, C.R., Erickson, R.A. and Ottensmeyer, E.J. (1989a) Industrial development organizations and the local dependence hypothesis,Policy Studies Journal, 17, 624–42.
Humphrey, C.R., Erickson, R.A. and McCluskey, R.E. (1989b) Industrial development groups, external connections, and job generation in local communities,Economic Development Quarterly, 3, 32–45.
Kanter, R.M. and Summers, D.V. (1987) Doing well while doing good: dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for a multiple-constituency approach, in W.W. Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Logan, J. (1976a) Industrialization and the stratification of cities in suburban regions,American Journal of Sociology, 82, 333–48.
Logan, J. (1976b) Notes on the growth machine-toward a comparative political economy of place,American Journal of Sociology, 82, 349–52.
Logan, J. and Molotch, H. (1987)Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Molotch, H. (1976) The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place,American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309–32.
Molotch, H. and Logan, J. (1984) Tensions in the growth machine: overcoming resistance to value-free development,Social Problems, 31, 483–99.
Rubin, H.J. (1986) Local economic development organizations and activities of small cities in encouraging economic growth,Policy Studies Journal, 14, 363–88.
Rubin, I. (1985), Structural theories and urban fiscal stress,Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 469–86.
Rubin, I. and Rubin, H.J. (1987) Economic development incentives: the poor (cities) pay more,Urban Affairs Quarterly, 23, 37–62.
Saidel, J.R. (1989) Dimensions of interdependence: the state and voluntary-sector relationship,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 335–47.
Salamon, L.M. (1987) Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state,Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 29–49.
Simon, J.G. (1987) The tax treatment of nonprofit organizations: a review of federal and state policies, in W.W. Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
US Office of Technology Assessment (1986)Technology and Structural Unemployment: Reemploying Displaced Adults, OTA-ITE-250 US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Weisbrod, B.A. (1988)The Nonprofit Economy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Wolch, J. (1993) Voluntary organizations and democracy: issues and questions for research. Paper presented at the Conference on the Nonprofit Sector and Democracy: Identifying the Research Questions, sponsored by The Aspen Institute, Nonprofit Sector Research Fund, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Humphrey, C.R., Erickson, R.A. Public accountability in non-profit industrial development organisations. Voluntas 8, 39–63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354180
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354180