Skip to main content
Log in

Show me the way to the next worthy deed: Towards a microstructural theory of volunteering and giving

  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the data from a survey undertaken in the United States in 1992, this article examines the effects of altruism, self-interest and social ties on motivations to give and volunteer, as well as the effects of volunteering on definitions of life goals. Social ties with non-profit organisations were good predictors of both the value of charitable contributions and the time volunteered for charitable causes. The level of prior philanthropic activism and social connections with philanthropic institutions had an effect on life goals. Altruism and the desire for self-improvement had effects on volunteering, but not on giving. Utilitarian motives (expected career advancement) had no observable effects on volunteering or giving. Based on those findings, a general microstructural model of philanthropic behaviour is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J. and Scholz, J. (1990)An Econometric Analysis of Charitable Giving with Interdependent Preferences, Social Systems Research Institute, No. 9023, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Arrow, K. (1975) Gifts and exchanges, in E.S. Phelps (ed.)Altruism, Money, and Economic Theory, Russell Sage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, S.E., Cohn, S.F. and Whitaker, W.H. (1995) Beyond recruitment: predictors of differential participation in a national antihunger organization,Sociological Forum, 10, 1, 113–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. and Zelditch, M. Jr (1983) Artifacts and challenges: a comment on Lee and Ofshe,Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 1, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E.G. and Miller, J. (1986) Socialization and situational influences on sustained altruism,Child Development, 57, 6, 1358–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. (1983)Why Charity? The Case for a Third Sector, Sage, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1986)Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Northeastern University Press, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterbock, T.M. and London, B. (1983) Race political orientation, and participation: an empirical test of four competing theories,American Sociological Review, 48, 439–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadaway, C.K., Marler, P.L. and Chaves, M. (1993) What the polls don't show: a closer look at US church attendance,American Sociological Review, 58, 6, 741–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, V.A., Weitzman, M.A., Toppe, C.M. and Noga, S.M. (1992)Nonprofit Almanac 1992–1993: Dimensions of the Independent Sector, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, E. (1976) Personality characteristics of volunteers,Psychological Reports, 38, 855–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E. (1987) The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective, in W. Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D.A. (1993) Self-serving philanthropy and pareto optimality, in Avner Ben-Ner and Benedetto Gui (eds)The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R.C. (1978) Choice among behavior options: a methodology and an empirical example,Social Science Research, 7, 1, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.T. and Ofshe, Richard (1981) The impact of behavioral style and status characteristics on social influence: a test of two competing theories,Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 2, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, M and Shotland, T. (1983) Increasing charitable contributions: an experimental evaluation of the american cancer society's recommended solicitations procedures,Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 12, 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1982)Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1986) Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of freedom summer,American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, P.B. (1986) Demeanor, status cue of performance?Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 3, 228–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, K.R. (1991) John Donne's people: explaining differences between rational actors and altruists through cognitive frameworks,Journal of Politics, 53, 2, 394–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965)The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S.M. and Meindl, J.R. (1992) The congruence of motives and incentives in a voluntary organization,Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 425–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingen, P.H. (1978) Inducing compliance with a donation request,Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochford, E.B. (1982) Recruitment strategies, ideology, and organization in the Hare Krishna movement,Social Problems, 29, 399–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L.M. (1992)America's Nonprofit Sector: A Primer, The Foundation Center, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L.M. and Anheier, H.K. (1996)The Emerging Nonprofit Sector: An Overview, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, S.J. (1983) Expectation-based and automatic behavior: a comment on Lee and Ofshe and Berger and Zelditch,Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 1, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.A., Zurcher, L.A. and Ekland-Olson, S. (1980) Social networks and social movements: a microstructural approach to differnetial recruitment,American Sociological Review, 45, 787–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.A., Zurcher, L.A. and Ekland-Olson, S. (1983) Further thoughts on social networks and movement recruitment,Sociology, 17, 112–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986) Frame alignment process, micromobilization, and movement participation.,American Sociological Review, 51, 464–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S.S. (1991) Factors affecting philanthropic behavior of Jewish adolescents,Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 3, 345–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A version of this paper was presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sokolowski, S.W. Show me the way to the next worthy deed: Towards a microstructural theory of volunteering and giving. Voluntas 7, 259–278 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354118

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354118

Keywords

Navigation