Skip to main content
Log in

Membership participation and ideology in large voluntary organisations: The case of the National Trust

  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Commonly, voluntary organisations are formally accountable to their memberships, but the rights of members to influence organisational policies are often minimal. Members may be recruited by organisations to provide funding, legitimacy and voluntary help; members may join in order to obtain material benefits, to express support for organisations' goals and, in some cases, to influence policy. The disjunction between these two sets of expectations can lead to disputes in large voluntary bodies, especially those whose members hold a wide range of ideological positions. This creates problems for those running the organisations, who both have to account to a variety of other groups and also maintain their public legitimacy. Illustrations of some of these issues are drawn from environmental organisations, particularly the National Trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkell Committee (1983)The National Trust, its Members and the Public, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson Committee (1968)The National Trust: Report of the Council's Advisory Committee on the Trust's Constitution, Organisation and Responsibilities, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (1990) Contracted services: issues for the nonprofit agency manager, inTowards the 21st Century: Challenges for the Voluntary Sector, Proceedings of the 1990 conference of the Association of Voluntary Action Scholars, Centre for Voluntary Organisation, London School of Economics, London.

  • Blau, P. and Scott, R. (1963)Formal Organisations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannadine, D. (1995) The first hundred years, in H. Newby (ed.)The National Trust: The Next Hundred Years, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F.S. (1951) The growth of bureaucracy: an hypothesis,American Sociological Review, 16, 835–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, P. and Klein, R. (1987)Accountabilities: Five Public Services, Tavistock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kluiver, H.J. (1990) Democracy, rights and NGOs, inTowards the 21st Century: Challenges for the Voluntary Sector, Proceedings of the 1990 Conference of the Association of Voluntary Action Scholars, Centre for Voluntary Organisation, London School of Economics, London.

  • Di Maggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields,American Sociological Review, 48, 147–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedden, R. (1974)The National Trust, Past and Present, Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, M. (1993) Democracy in large voluntary organisations—does it matter?. unpublished paper, Policy Studies Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaze, J. (1988)Figures in a Landscape, Barrie and Jenkins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.D. (1987) A historical overview of the private nonprofit sector, in W. W. Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, R. (1987)The Heritage Industry, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P.Q. (1994)Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansley, J. and Kumar, S. (1995) Approvers and accountability, Paper given at a conference onResearching the Voluntary Sector, organised by NCVO andNon-Profit Studies, London.

  • Leat, D. (1988)Voluntary Organisations and Accountability, NCVO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leat, D. (1990) Voluntary organisations and accountability: theory and practice, in H.K. Anheier and W. Seibel (eds)The Third Sector: Comparative Studies in Nonprofit Organisations, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. and Goyder, J. (1983)Environmental Groups in Politics, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1911)Political Parties, E. T. 1962, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. (1987)Founders of the National Trust, Christopher Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Trust (1994)Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting, 16 July 1994, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Trust (1995)Annual Report and Accounts, 1994/5, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, H. (1995)The National Trust: The Next Hundred Years, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Lord (1993)The Oliver Report on the Constitution, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, R. (1994)Theatres of Memory, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R.G.S. (Chair) (1993)The Conservation and Management of Red Deer in the West Country, Report to the Council of the National Trust by the Deer Hunting Working Party, National Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.H. (1991) Four sectors or five? Retaining the member-benefit sector,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 2, 137–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.H. (1993) Public benefit and member benefit nonprofit, voluntary groups,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 1, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. and 6, P. (1994) Membership in voluntary organisations: do we know what we mean by it?, Paper given at the 1994 annual conference of the Association of Researchers into Nonprofit Organisations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA), Berkeley, California.

  • Thomson, R.S. (1979)The Charity Commission and the Age of Reform, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. (1985)On Living in an Old Country, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this article was given at the first international conference of the International Society for Third Sector Research at Pecs, Hungary, in July 1994. I am very grateful to Michael Fogarty, Peter Jackson and Jean Warburton for detailed comments on earlier drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lansley, J. Membership participation and ideology in large voluntary organisations: The case of the National Trust. Voluntas 7, 221–240 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354116

Keywords

Navigation