Skip to main content
Log in

Competing for tots: operating objectives and characteristics of for-profit and not-for-profit child care centres in the Pacific Northwest

  • Articles
  • Published:
Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Child care services are provided by profit-oriented businesses, not-forprofit agencies and governmental units. This paper compares goal priorities and operating characteristics of not-for-profit and for-profit child care centres in parts of Canada and the United States. Directors of 292 Pacific Northwest centres responded to a survey about their financial and non-financial operating objectives.

The relative rankings of objectives were similar for not-for-profit and for-profit centres, and for centres in both countries. Non-financial objectives were rated higher than financial objectives. Satisfying the developmental and educational needs of children was the single most important operating objective. Providing access to eligible children was the next most important objective, particularly for not-for-profit centres and for those with government-subsidised children. The remaining objectives, in order of importance, were minimising costs, maximising utilisation, maximising revenues and maximising profits. Profit maximisation was ranked low by both not-for-profit and for-profit respondents. Not-for-profit and for-profit centres exhibited differences on a number of operating characteristics, services provided and employee benefits. Such characteristics were found to be associated with auspices (not-for-profit or for-profit) and location (US or Canada).

Results suggest that centres operating under both auspices are capable of altruistic behaviour. Differences in motivation between organisational forms were very small. However, variations in operating characteristics and services suggest that the objectives are achieved in dissimilar ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, Armen and Demsetz, H. (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization,American Economic Review, December, 777–95.

  • Badelt, Christoph and Weiss, Peter (1990) Specialization, product differentiation and ownership structure in personal social services: the case of nursery schools,Kyklos, 43, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, Avner (1986) Non-profit organizations: why do they exist in market economies? in Susan Rose-Ackerman (ed.)The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy Oxford University Press Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, James (1983)Why Charity? The Case for a Third Sector, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, James (1987) Political theories of nonprofit organization, in Walter Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, James M. and Graddy, Elizabeth (1989) Fading distinctions among the nonprofit, government, and for-profit sectors, in V.A. Hodgkinson, R.W. Lyman and Associates (eds)The Future of the Nonprofit Sector, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Henry (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise,Yale Law Journal, 89, 835–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Henry (1986) Status organizations,Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2, 119–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Henry (1987) Economic theories of nonprofit organization, in Walter Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, William L. (1988)Statistics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisker, Ellen E., Hofferth, Sandra L., Phillips, Deborah and Farquhar, Elizabeth (1981)A Profile of Child Care Settings: Early Education and Care in 1990, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Harold (1989) Ethics and the private non-profit human service organization,Administration in Social Work, 13:2, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1986) Altruistic nonprofit firms in competitive markets: the case of day-care centers in the United States,Journal of Consumer Policy, 9, 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1990) Competition between non-profits and for-profits: entry and growth,Voluntas, 1, 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Richard (1987) Nonprofit organizations and the market, in Walter Powell (ed.)The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, Burton A. (1977)The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector, D.C. Heath & Co., Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Dennis R. (1983)If Not for Profit, For What? D.C. Heath & Co., Lexington, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Dennis R. (1989) Beyond tax exemption: a focus on organizational performance versus legal status, in V.A. Hodgkinson, R.W. Lyman and Associates (eds)The Future of the Nonprofit Sector, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher, J., Gordon, T.P., Nunamaker, T. et al. Competing for tots: operating objectives and characteristics of for-profit and not-for-profit child care centres in the Pacific Northwest. Voluntas 5, 59–85 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353952

Keywords

Navigation