Abstract
Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, this article expands upon earlier empirical efforts to understand intergenerational welfare participation in the United States. Empirical studies have suggested that growing up in a household that receives Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) increases the probability that a child will receive AFDC, although little insight exists on the dynamics of this relationship. In particular, no one has formally examined how the time a daughter spends on AFDC varies from the time her parents receive welfare. By observing the behavior of parents and their daughters for five years, this study examines the length of participation in AFDC across generations. The results imply that growing up in a household that receives AFDC increases the amount of time that a daughter will also receive aid, although the time a daughter receives AFDC is not affected by the length of time parents receive AFDC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An, C., Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1993). Teen out-of-wedlock births and welfare receipt: The role of childhood events and economic circumstances.Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 195–208.
Antel, J. J. (1992). The intergenerational transfer of welfare dependency: Some statistical evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 467–473.
Becketti, S., Gould, W., Lilliard, L., & Welch, F. (1988). The Panel Study of Income Dynamics after fourteen years: An evaluation.Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 472–492.
Duncan, G. J., Hill, M. S., & Hoffman, S. D. (1988). Welfare dependence within and across generations.Science, 239, 467–471.
Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1994).A study of sample attrition in the Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Unpublished manuscript.
Gottschalk, P. (1992). The intergenerational transmission of welfare participation: Facts and possible causes.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 254–272.
Gottschalk, P., McLanahan, S. & Sandefur, G. (1992, May). The dynamics and intergenerational transmission of poverty and welfare participation.Institute of Research on Poverty Conference Paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Maddala, G. S. (1983).Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics (chapter 6). London: Cambridge University Press.
McLanahan, S. S. (1988). Family structure and dependency: Early transitions to female household headship,Demography, 25, 1–16.
Moffitt, R. (1983). An economic model of welfare stigma.American Economic Review, 73, 1023–1035.
Moffitt, R. (1992). Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: A review.Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1–61.
Morgan, J. N., Duncan, G. J., Hill, M. S., & Lepkowski, J. (1992).Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968–1989, [waves I–XXII], [Computer File]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center (producer). Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).
Mueller, D. C. (1989).Public Choice II (Chapter 23). New York: Cambridge University Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1989).Poverty in the United States: 1987. Current Population Reports, Series P-60, No. 163. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means (1984, 1985, 1986 & 1988).Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wolfe, B., Haveman, R., Ginther, D., & An, C. (1994).The “window problem” in studies of children's attainments: A methodological exploration. Unpublished manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
His research interests include welfare programs, tax policies, local public finance, and econometrics.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pepper, J.V. Dynamics of the intergenerational transmission of welfare receipt in the United States. J Fam Econ Iss 16, 265–279 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353711
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353711