Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 100–105 | Cite as

Linear interpolation error in measured surfaces in a dental erosion study



An extensive palatal erosion study, which is currently being undertaken at the University of Dundee, aims to detect erosion through the precise mapping of replicas of children's incisors. All perceived sources of error are being scrutinised closely. The error due to the interpolation of surface positions from discrete point measurements has been investigated so that its contribution to the erosion estimates can be gauged. The calculation of the error statistics made use of covariance functions to express the undulation of the tooth surfaces. It has been found that, for the measurement point spacing of 150 μm being used in the current project, the interpolation error for an incisor is typically about 25 μm, to be compared with the root-mean-square error due to tooth impression and replication procedures, assessed as being in the order of ±3 μm, and replica measurement, assessed as being in the order of ±5 μm. The interpolation error constitutes a surprisingly large proportion of the overall system error. The same error estimation technique can be applied usefully and without difficulty to other research studies concerning erosion or wear in natural or restorative dental surfaces.


Interpolation Statistics Dentistry Wear Erosion 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Azzopardi, A., Bartlett, D. W., Watson, T. F., Smith, andBernard, G. N. (2000): ‘A literature review of the techniques to measure tooth wear and erosion’,Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor: Dent.,8, pp. 93–97Google Scholar
  2. Chadwick, R. G., Mitchell, H. L., Cameron, I., Hunter, B., andTully, M. (1997): ‘Development of a novel system for assessing tooth and restoration wear’,J. Dentistry,25, pp. 41–47Google Scholar
  3. Chadwick, R. G., Mitchell, H. L., andWard, S. (2002): ‘Evaluating the accuracy and reproducibility of a replication technique for the manufacture of electroconductive replicas for use in quantitative clinical dental wear studies’,J. Oral Rehabil.,29, pp. 540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, J. C. (1986): ‘Statistics and data analysis in geology’, 2nd edn (Wiley, New York, 1986), p. 646Google Scholar
  5. Jovanovski, V., andLynch, E. (2000): ‘Analysis of the morphology of oral structures from 3-D coordinate data’, inFaller, R. V. (Ed.): ‘Assessment of oral health diagnostic techniques and validation criteria. Monographs in Oral Science, vol. 17’, (Karger, Mason, Ohio, 2000)Google Scholar
  6. Lambrechts, P., Braem, M., Vuylsteke-Wauters, M. andVanherle, G. (1989): ‘Quantitativein vivo wear of human enamel’,J. Dental Res.,68, pp. 1752–1754Google Scholar
  7. Maupomé, G. andRay, J. M. (2000): ‘Structured review of enamel erosion literature (1980–1998): A critical appraisal of experimental, clinical and review publications’,Oral Diseases,6, pp. 197–207Google Scholar
  8. Mitchell, H. L., andChadwick, R. G. (1998): ‘Mathematical shape matching as a tool in toothwear assessment—development and conduct’,J. Oral Rehabil.,25, pp. 921–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peters, M. C. R. B., Delong, R. M., Pintado, R., Pallesen, U., Qvist, V., andDouglas, W. H. (1999): ‘Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear’,J. Dentistry,27, pp. 479–485Google Scholar
  10. Pintado, M. R., Anderson, G. C., De Long, R., andDouglas, W. H. (1997): ‘Variation in tooth wear in young adults over a two-year period’,J. Prosthe. Dent.,77, pp. 313–320Google Scholar
  11. Wiskott, H. W. A., Perriard, J., Scherrer, S. S., andBesler, U. C. (2000): ‘A new method to quantify wear using implant supported restorations’,Dent. Mater.,16, pp. 218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.School of MathematicsUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.The Dental SchoolUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations