Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 77, Issue 1, pp 34–49 | Cite as

Injury-producing events among children in low-income communities: The role of community characteristics

  • Patricia O'Campo
  • Ravi P. Rao
  • Andrea Carlson Gielen
  • Wendy Royalty
  • Modena Wilson
Special Feature: Urban Home Environment and Health Original Articles: Housing and Health

Abstract

Study Purpose

Injury remains the leading cause of death in children aged 1 to 4 years. Past studies of determinants of injuries among young children have most often focused on the microlevel, examining characteristics of the child, parent, family, and home environments. We sought to determine whether and how selected neighborhood economic and physical characteristics within these low-income communities are related to differences in risk of events with injury-producing potential among infants and young children.

Methods

Our study used both individual-level data and information on the characteristics of the neighborhood of residence to describe the prevalence of events with injury-producing potential among infants and young children in three low-income communities in Baltimore City, Maryland. Our sample was 288 respondents who participated in a random household survey. Information on respondent (age, employment, and length of residence in the neighborhood) and neighborhood characteristics (average per capita income, rate of housing violations, and crime rate) were available. Methods of multilevel Poisson regression analysis were employed to identify which of these characteristics were associated with increased risk of experiencing an event with injury-producing potential in the month prior to the interview.

Results

Although all three communities were considered low income, considerable variation in neighborhood characteristics and 1-month prevalence rates of events with injury-producing potential were observed. Younger age of respondent and higher rates of housing violations were associated significantly with increased risk of a child under 5 years old in the household experiencing an event with injury-producing potential.

Conclusions

Information on community characteristics was important to understanding the risks for injuries and could be used to develop community-based prevention interventions.

Keywords

Young Child Prevention Intervention Capita Income Household Survey Home Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine.Reducing the Burden of Injuries. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson M, Baker SP, Teret SP, Shock S, Garbarino J.Saving Children: a Guide to Injury Prevention. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fingerhut L, Warner M.Injury Chartbook, Health United States, 1996–97. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peterson L, Bartelstone J, Kern T, Gillies R. Parents' socialization of children's injury prevention: description and some initial parameters.Child Dev. 1995;66(1):224–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garling A, Garling T. Mothers' anticipation and prevention of unintentional injury to young children in the home.J Pediatr Psychol. 1995;20(1):23–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gielen AC, Wilson ME, Faden RR, Wissow L, Harvilchuck J. In-home injury prevention practices for infants and toddlers: the role of parental beliefs, barriers, and housing quality.Health Educ Q. 1995 February;22(1):85–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan G, Aber J, editors,Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O'Campo P, Gielen AC, Faden RR, Xue X, Kass N, Wang M. Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis.Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1092–1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O'Campo P, Xue X, Wang MC, Caughy M. Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multi-level analysis.Am J Public Health. 1997 July;87(7):1113–1118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351–377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wehr E, Jameson EJ. Beyond benefits: the importance of a pediatric standard in private insurance contracts to ensuring health care access for children.Future Child. 1994;4(3): 115–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durken MS, Davidson LL, Kuhn L, O'Connor P, Barlow B. Low-income neighborhoods and the risk of severe pediatric injury: a small-area analysis in northern Manhattan.Am J Public Health. 1994;84(4):587–592.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alwash R, McCarthy M. Injury controls in childhood.Dev Behav: Older Children and Adolescents. 1992;39:471–485.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Braddock M, Lapidus G, Gregorio D, Kapp M, Banco L. Population, income and ecological correlates of pedestrian injury.Pediatrics. 1991;88:1242–1247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control. Injury prevention: meeting the challenge.Am J Prev Med. 1989;5(3 suppl):1–303.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reading R, Langford IH, Haynes R, Lovett A. Accidents to preschool children: comparing family and neighborhood risk factors.Soc Sci Med. 1999 February;48(3):321–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldstein H.Multi-level Models Project. London: Institute of Education, University of London; 1995.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roberts I, Norton R, Taua B. Child pedestrian injury rates: the importance of “exposure to risk” relating to socioeconomic and ethnic differences, in Auckland, New Zealand.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50:162–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stone D. Research on injury prevention: time for an international agenda?J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50:127–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baker SP, O'Neill B, Ginsburg M, Li G.The Injury Fact Book. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Connell J, Aber J, Walker G. How do urban communities affect youth? Using social science research to inform the design and evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives. In: Connell J, Kubisch A, Schorr L, and Weiss C, eds.New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute; 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones K, Duncan C. Individuals and their ecologies: analyzing the geography of chronic illness within a multilevel modeling framework.Health Place. 1995;1(1):27–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    DiPrete TA, Forristal J. Multilevel models: methods and substance.Annu Rev Sociol. 1994;20:331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia O'Campo
    • 1
  • Ravi P. Rao
    • 2
  • Andrea Carlson Gielen
    • 3
  • Wendy Royalty
    • 4
  • Modena Wilson
    • 5
  1. 1.Departments of Maternal and Child Health and EpidemiologyUSA
  2. 2.Virginia School of MedicineUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Policy and ManagementUSA
  4. 4.Baltimore City Health DepartmentBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Department of PediatricsSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations