Skip to main content
Log in

A theory of gene-culture coevolution of parental preference and sex ratio in humans

  • Published:
Journal of Ethology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A theory on the evolution of human primary sex ratio is proposed. Effects of parental preference for sons, reflected in birth control based on offspring sex ratio and female biased infanticide, on the evolution of primary sex ratio are analyzed. Both are shown to select for female bias in primary sex ratio. The gene-culture coevolution of female infanticide and primary sex ratio is also studied and it is shown that female infanticide develops more in societies in which the father plays a more important role in the transmission of culture than the mother does.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnov, E. L. 1979 Genetical evolution of pattern of sexuality. Darwinian fitness.Am. Nat. 113: 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. 1982 The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., S. D. Albon & F. E. Guinness 1984 Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer.Nature 300: 178–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. J. 1871 The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickemann, M. 1979 Female infanticide, reproductive strategies, and social stratification: a preliminary model. In: N. Chagnon & W. Irons (eds.)Evolutionary biology and human social behavior: An anthropological perspective. pp. 321–367. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., J. M. Emlen & S. A. Levin 1986 Sex-ratio selection in species with helpers-at-the-nest.Am. Nat. 127: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. 1930 Genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. & M. R. Lennartz 1986 Sex ratio of nestling and fledgling red-cockaded woodpeckers (Picoides borealis) favor males.Am. Nat. 126: 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausfater, G. & S. B. Hrdy (eds.) 1984 Infanticide, comparative and evolutionary perspectives. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. 1979 Infanticide among animals: a review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females.Ethol. Sociobiol. 1: 13–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. L. 1981 Female infanticide: Sex ratio manipulation in humans.Ethol. Sociobiol. 2: 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. 1965 Ecological consequences of natural selection. In: T. Waterman & H. Horowits (eds.)Theoretical and mathematical biology. pp. 388–397. Blaisdell, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. 1974 Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakrasi, K. & B. Sasmal 1970 Effect of infanticide on sex-ratio in an Indian population.Z. Morph. Anthrop. 62: 214–230.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. F. 1961 The effect of polygamy and infanticide on the sex ratio.Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop.19: 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. F. & J. D. Mohler 1953 The selective significance of the sex ratio.Am. Nat. 87: 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum, M. S. & N. Mantel 1971. Socioeconomic factors and the sex ratio at birth.J. Biosoc. Sci. 3: 23–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. 1985 Social evolution. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Harada, Y. A theory of gene-culture coevolution of parental preference and sex ratio in humans. J. Ethol. 7, 17–25 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350578

Keywords

Navigation