Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic examination of the operated stomach: A review and a systematic approach

  • Clinical Practice
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endoscopist examining a patient with a history of gastric surgery is expected to know details of the history, the present physical condition, and relevant laboratory results. Familiarity with the appropriateness or limiations of different types of fiberscopes in relation to the individual case, and knowledge of how to overcome common difficulties, is important. The preparation must address the particular characteristics of the case, and the endoscopist must be aware of contraindications, complications, and recommendations to be observed in special circumstance. Based on situations confronted in daily practice, the authors suggest a systematic approach to the examination of patients with a history of gastric surgery, and point to the importance of observing the following steps: measurement of the length of the greater curvature in the gastric stump, verification of artifacts and anatomic modifications and their repercussions, removal of symptomatic suture line or staples, dilatation of strictures, fragmentation of bezoars, exeresis of polypoid lesions, collection of tissue samples, and regular follow up of the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Savalgi RS, Corbishley CM, Caygilki C, et al. Relation between severity and extent of precancerous lesions in the postoperative stomach. Lancet 1990;336:413–416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quinton A, Lamouliatte H. Séqueles et complications tardives de la chirurgie gastrique. Encyclopedie médico-chirurgical, série estomac-intestin. Paris. 1983;4028, B10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander-Williams J. Problems after gastric surgery and their assessment. In: Tytgat GNJ, Van Blankenstein M (eds) Current topics in gastroenterology and hepatology. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme, 1990;164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demling L, Elster K, Koch H, Rösch W (eds) Endoscopy and biopsy of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum—a color atlas. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982;164–172.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manogold BC. Endoscopy of the operated stomach. In: Frühmorgen P, Classen M (eds) Endoscopy and biopsy in gastroenterology (Portuguese version of the Geran original). Sao Paulo: EPU/Springer, 1980:77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blackstone MO, Endoscopic interpretation—normal and pathologic appearance of the gastrointestinal tract. New York: Raven, 1984;177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deitel M, Bendago M. Endoscopy of vertical banded gastroplasty. Am Surg 1989;55(5):287–290.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Misiewicz JJ, Tytgat GNJ, Goodwin CS, et al. The Sydney system: A new classification of gastritis. Working Party Reports (World Congress of Gastroenterology, Sydney) 1990;1–10.

  9. Gowen GF. Delayed gastric emptying after Roux-en-Y due to four types of partial obstruction. Ann Surg 1992;215(4):363–367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Connor HJ, Axon ATR.Campylobacter pylori, gastric ulceration, and the postoperative stomach. In: Rathborn BJ, Heatley RV (eds)Campylobacter pylori and gastroduodenal disease. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1989;125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fries H, Malfertheiner P, Flock F, et al. Elimination ofHelicobacter pylori by single-shot antibiotic treatment in patients undergoing proximal gastric vagotomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;4(9):719–725.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wirth HP, Schweiwiller A, Flury R, et al.Helicobacter pylori. Besiedlung des Teilresezierten Magens. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1992;122(26):1015–1019.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Connor MJ, Allen JI, Vennes JA. Endoscopy in the postoperative upper gastrointestinal tract. In: Sivak MV (ed) Gastrointestinal endoscopy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1987;530–560.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cotton PB, Rosenberg MT, Axon ATR, et al. Diagnostic yield of fibre-optic endoscopy in the operated stomach. Br J Surg 1993;60(8):629–632.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silverstein FE, Tytgat GJ. Atlas of gastrointestinal endoscopy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1987; Chapter 5, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Classen M, Rösch W, Seubert K, et al. Operative endoscopy: A diathermy-book for cutting of non-absorbable suture material. Endoscopy 1972;6:43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kadota T, Hiraide H, Imai J, et al. An easy and safe modified method of endoscopic balloon dilatation for gastrectomy anastomotic stricture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170(5):445–447.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrisey JF, Reichelderfer M. Gastrointestinal endoscopy (Part I) N Engl J Med 1991;325(16):1142–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raffin SB, Bezoars. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS (eds) Gastrointestinal disease—pathophysiology, diagnosis, management. 3rd. ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1983;698.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parneix M. Traltement chirurgical des complications tardives et séqueles de la chirurgie gastrique. Encyclopedie médicochirurgicale, série estomac-intestin Paris. 1983;9029, C10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lacaine F, Houry S, Huguier M. Stomach cancer after partial gastrectomy for benign ulcer disease. A critical analysis of epidemiological reports. Hepato-Gastroenterology 1992;39(1):4–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakai P, Filho UL, Cabrera PA, et al. Fiberoptic endoscopy in the diagnosis of retained gastric antrum. Endoscopy 1983;15(4):246–248.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ottenjan R, Elster K (eds) Atlas of diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Smith Kline, 1980;253–271.

  24. Manegold BC. Early postoperative endoscopy in the operated stomach. Endoscopy 1981;13(3):104–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Franzin G, Benini M, Manfrini C, et al. Surveillance endoscopique de l'estomac opéré: si, pourquoi, comment, quand, Acta Endoscopica 1989;19(2):67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Offerhaus GJA, Huibregtse K, De Boer J, et al. The operated stomach: A premalignant condition? Scand J Gastroenterol 1984;19(4):521–524.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Offerhaus GJ, Tersmette AC, Giardiello FM, et al. Evaluation of endoscopy for early detection of gastric stump cancer. Lancet 1992;340:33–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Potet F, Camilleri JP. Population a haut risque et dysplasies pré-cancéreuses de l'estomac: Definition et attitude pratique. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1982;6:454–461.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wotherspoon AC, Doglioni C, Isaacson MG. Low-grade gastric B cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lyphoid tissue (MALT): A multifocal disease. Histopathology 1992;20(1):29–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moreaux J. Indications et résultats de la chirurgie dans les cancers gastriques. Encyclopédie médico-chirurgicale, série estomac-intestin. Paris. 1983:p9028 D10.

  31. Hoang C, Galian A. Dysplasies gastriques. Encyclopédie médico-chirurgicale, série estomac-intestin. Paris. 1991;p9021, B35.

  32. Tada M, Ida K, Kawai K. Endoscopic dye-spraying method and magnified observation in gastroscopy and colonoscopy (in Japanese, with English abstract) Stomach Intest 1986;21(2):145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Demirci S, Gohchi A. A comparative study for fiberoptic and video endoscope determination of the extent in minimal changes of gastric mucosa using indigo dye spraying. Surg Endosc 1990; 4:80–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandes, E., Devis, G. Endoscopic examination of the operated stomach: A review and a systematic approach. J Gastroenterol 29, 792–796 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349290

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349290

Key words

Navigation