Skip to main content

Biological dynamic farming — An occult form of alternative agriculture?

Abstract

An analysis of the theory of biodynamic farming is presented. The founder of biological dynamic agriculture, the Austrian Rudolf Steiner, Ph.D., (1861–1925), introduced methods of preparation and use of eight compounds forming the nucleus of his agricultural theory. His instructions were based on insights and inner visions from spiritualistic exercises and not on agricultural experiments. His purpose was to show mankind a form of agriculture that enables not only the production of healthy foods but also the achievement of harmonious interactions in agriculture and a spiritual development of mankind through “cosmic forces” captured in the foods. However, many of his statements are not provable simply because scientifically clear hypotheses cannot be made as his descriptions were unclear and not stringent. Those predictions that can be tested scientifically have been found to be incorrect. It was concluded that Steiner's instructions are occult and dogmatic and cannot contribute to the development of alternative or sustainable agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Abele, U. 1978.Ertragssteigerung durch Flüssigmistbehandlung. KTBL-Schrift 224. Münster-Hiltrup, Germany: Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, E. 1984. Wirkung der biologisch-dynamischen Rotte-Präparate auf die Umsetzungen von befeuchtetem Weizenstroh im Laboratoriumsversuch.Leb. Erde 5: 196–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauchhenss, J. and S. Herr. 1986. Vergleichende Untersuchungen der Individiendichte, Biomasse, Artendichte und Diversität von Regenwurmpopulationen auf konventionell und alternativ bewirtschafteten Flächen.Bayerisch. Landwirtschaft. Jahrbuch 8: 1002–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. 1986. Bodenmikrobiologische Untersuchungen.Bayerisch Landwirtschaft Jahrbuch 8: 996–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockemühl, J. 1981.Vom Leben des Komposthaufens. Goetheanum Dornach, Switzerland: Philosophisch-Anthroposophischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewes, T. 1985. Zur Wirkung biologisch-dynamischer Präparate unterschiedlicher Jahrgänge und Herkunft auf die Rotte von befeuchtetem Weizenstroh im Laborversuch.Leb. Erde 5: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. and H. Weigelt. 1986. Vergleichende Bodenuntersuchungen von konventionell und alternativ bewirtschafteten Betriebsschlägen.Bayerisch. Landwirtschaft. Jahrbuch 8: 979–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlouhy, J. 1981.Alternative Forms of Agriculture-Quality of Plant Products from Conventional and Biodynamic Growing. Ph.D. thesis. Report No 91. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Department of Plant Husbandry. [in Swedish, English summary].

    Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist, M. 1970.Gestaltkräfte des Lebendigen. Frankfurt, Germany: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppendorfer, W.H. 1978. Effect of N-fertilization on Amino Acid Composition and Nutritive Value of Spinach, Kale, Cauliflower and Potatoes.J. Sci. Food Agric. 29(4): 305–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finck, A. 1982.Fertilizers and Fertilization. Introduction and Practical Guide to Crop Fertilization. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, W. and H.H. Koepf. 1982. A Contribution to the Development of Test for the Biodynamic Preparations.Elemente der Naturwissenschaft 36(1): 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf, U. and E.R. Keller. 1978. Zusammenhänge zwischen kosmischen Konstellationen und dem Ertrag landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen auf konventionell und biologisch-dynamisch bewirtschafteten Böden.J. Agron & Crop. Sci. 147: 40–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, I. 1981a. Untersuchungen über die Strahlenwirksamkeit der biologischdynamischen Kompostpräparate 502–506.Leb. Erde 3: 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981b. Untersuchungen über die Strahlenwirksamkeit der biologisch-dynamischen Kompostpräparate 502–506.Leb. Erde 4: 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Strahlenwirksamkeit der biologisch-dynamischen Kompostpräparate 502–506.Leb. Erde 6: 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, H. and E. Breda. 1962. Versuche über Stallmistkompostierung.Leb. Erde 3: 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, S.L. 1948. Reform Tendencies in Agriculture. A Review.J. R. Swed. Acad. Agric. For. 137: 129–160. [In Swedish with English summary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchmann, H. and E. Witter. 1992. Composition of Fresh, Aerobic and Anaerobic Farm Animal Dungs.Bioresource Technology 40: 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koepf, H.H., B.D. Pettersson, and W. Schaumann. 1980.Biologische Landwirtschaft. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag Eugen Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolisko, E. and L. Kolisko. 1978.Agriculture of Tomorrow. 2nd edition. Bournemouth, U.K.: Kolisko Archive Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampkin, N. 1993. Personal communication. Author of the book:Organic Farming, 1990. Ipswich, U.K.: Farming Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Minzi, R., R. Riffaldi, and A. Saviozzi. 1986. Organic Matter and Nutrients in Fresh and Mature Farmyard Manure.Agric. Wastes 16: 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maidl, F.X., M. Demmel, and G. Fischbeck. 1988. Vergleichende Untersuchungen ausgewählter Parameter der Bodenfruchtbarkeit auf konventionell und alternativ bewirtschafteten Standorten.Landwirtsch Forschung 41(3–4): 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner, H. 1986.Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. London, U.K.: Academic Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, E.G. and K. Bakema. 1956. Effect of the Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Magnesium Nutrition of Potato Plants on the Content of Free Amino Acids and on the Amino Acids Composition of the Protein of the Tuber.Plant Soil 7: 135–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, B.D. 1982.Investigations within Conventional and Biodynamic Farming Systems. Meddelande Nr 32. Järna, Sweden: Nordisk forskningsring. [In Swedish, English summary].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, E.E. 1960.Chromatography Applied to Quality Testing. Stroudsburg, PA: Bio-Dynamic Farming & Gardening Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • . 1970. Rudolf Steiners landwirtschaftlicher Impuls. InWir erlebten Rudolf Steiner. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag Freies Geistesleben.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomonsson, L. and M. Larsson-Raznikiewicz. 1985. Qualitative and Quantitative Studies of Proteins of Wheat from Different Growing Systems.Swed. J. Agric. Res. 15: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, F. and E. von Wistinghausen. 1992.Bio-dynamic Farming Practice. Stourbridge, U.K.: Bio-dynamic Agricultural Association/Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R. 1975.Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen zum Gedeihen der Landwirtschaft. Dornach, Switzerland: Rudolf Steiner Verlag, Nachlassverwaltung.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1948.Spiritual Science and Medicine. London, U.K.: Rudolf Steiner Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1932.Mein Lebensgang. Dornach, Switzerland: Philosophisch-Antroposophischer Verlag, Nachlassverwaltung.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirchmann, H. Biological dynamic farming — An occult form of alternative agriculture?. J Agric Environ Ethics 7, 173–187 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349036

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349036

Keywords

  • biodynamic compounds
  • alternative agriculture
  • food test
  • spiritualistic purpose