References
Akimoto, S. 1985 Occurrence of abnormal phenotypes in a host-alternating aphid and their implications for genome organization and evolution.Evol. Theory 7: 179–193.
Akimoto, S. 1988 Is the origin of non-migratory aphids compatible with the neo-Darwinian theory? A comment on Aoki and Kurosu.J. Ethol. 6: 63–64.
Aoki, S. 1975 Descriptions of the Japanese species ofPemphigus and its allied genera (Homoptera: Aphidoidea).Ins. matsum. n.s. (5): 1–63.
Aoki, S. 1987 Evolution of sterile soldiers in aphids. In: Y. Itô, J. L. Brown & J. Kikkawa (eds.),Animal societies: theories and facts. pp. 53–65. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo.
Aoki, S. & U. Kurosu 1986 Soldiers of a European gall aphid,Pemphigus spyrothecae (Homoptera: Aphidoidea): Why do they molt?J. Ethol. 4: 97–104.
Aoki, S. & U. Kurosu 1988a Secondary monoecy of a North American gall aphid,Pemphigus monophagus (Homoptera, Aphidoidea).Kontyú 56: 394–401.
Aoki, S. & U. Kurosu 1988b Can root generations ofPemphigus (Homoptera, Aphidoidea) grow in the poplar gall?Kontyú 56 (in press).
Dawkins, R. 1986 The blind watchmaker. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow. 332 pp.
Harper, A. M. 1959 Gall aphids on poplar in Alberta II. Periods of emergence from galls, reproductive capcitis, and predators of aphids in galls.Can. Ent. 91: 680–685.
Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1973 Notes on some oriental aphids, with descriptions of a new genus and four new species (Homoptera: Aphididae).Orient. Ins. 7: 239–258.
Itô, Y. 1987 Are thick-legged larvae ofPemphigus spyrothecae ‘soldiers’?J. Ethol. 5: 210–211.
Mayr, E. 1970 Populations, species, and evolution, The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge. 453 pp.
Popper, K. R. 1945 The open society and its enemies. Japanese translation (1973). Sekaishisôsha, Tokyo. 463 +311 pp.
Sober, E. 1984 The nature of selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 383 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Aoki, S., Kurosu, U. Pemphigus “soldiers” and a defence of the generation-packing hypothesis: A response to Itô and Akimoto. J. Ethol. 6, 65–67 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348865
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348865