Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the silent period following motor evoked potential by magnetic stimulation method

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

During the voluntary contraction of target muscles, a silent period is observed immediately after the motor evoked potential (MEP) is elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. In this study, the silent period was recorded from bilateral abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) in 30 normal healthy subjects (120 extremities) and 30 patients with cervical myelopathy (120 extremities). In normal subjects, the silent period was 142.3±41.0 ms (mean±SD) for ADM, and 83.6±42.3 ms for AH. When stimulus intensity was increased from 60% to 95%, the length of the silent period increased, reaching almost maximal level. The length of the silent period correlated with stimulus intensity, but not with the contraction force of voluntary muscles. In patients with cervical myelopathy, the silent period was 69.2±27.8 ms (mean±SD) for ADM and 48.3±17.0 ms for AH, significantly shorter than in the normal subjects. We believe that the length of the silent period can be a useful parameter for indicating the function of the spinal inhibitory system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker AT, Freeston IL, Jalinous R, et al. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol 1985;369:3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Delwaide PJ. Human monosynaptic reflexes and presynaptic inhibition. In: Desmedt JE, editor. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. vol. 3. Karger: Basel, 1973:508–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eisen A, Siejka S, Schulzer M, et al. Age-dependent decline in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude: With a comment on changes in Parkinson's disease. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1991;81:209–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins DC, Lieberman JS. The muscle silent period: Variability in normal man. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1968;24:176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann P. Demonstration eines Hemmungsreflexes im menschlichen Rückenmark. Zeitschrift für Biologie 1919;70:515–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Iizuka T, Azuma H, Tanaka H et al. Magnetic transcutaneous stimulation of the motor pathway in spinal cord disorders. In: Shimoji K, Kurokawa T, Tamaki T, Willis WD Jr, editors. Spinal cord monitoring and electrodiagnosis. Berlin Heidelberg, New York Tokyo: Springer, 1991:253–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iizuka T, Iida S, Imai T, et al. Evaluation of motor pathways in patients with cervical myelopathy by magnetic stimulation: Pre-, intra-, and postoperative study. In: Jones SJ, Boyd S, Hetreed M, Smith NJ, editors. Handbook of spinal cord monitoring. London: Kluwer Academic, 1994:294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kamekyama O, Hayes KC, Wolfe D. Methodological considerations contributing to variability of the quadriceps H reflex. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989;68:277–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura J. Recurrent inhibition of motoneurons during the silent period in man. In: Desmedt JE, editor. Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. New York: Raven, 1983:459–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lance JW, Gillies JD. Presynaptic inhibition induced by vibration. Jpn J EEG EMG 1973;2:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merton PA. The silent period in a muscle of the human hand. J Physiol 1951;114:183–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahani BT, Young RR. Studies of the normal human silent period. In: Desmedt JE, editor. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology. vol. 3. Karger, Basel, 1973:589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka R. The role of inhibition to human motor control (in Japanese). Rinsho Seikei Geka (Clin Orthop Surg) 1990;25:1049–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uozumi T, Ito Y, Tsuji S, et al. Inhibitory period following motor potentials evoked by magnetic cortical stimulation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992;85:273–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Suyama, N., Shindo, H. & Iizuka, T. Study of the silent period following motor evoked potential by magnetic stimulation method. J Orthop Sci 1, 301–306 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348839

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02348839

Key words

Navigation