Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of acetylcholine (Ach) for spreading metaphase chromosomes and application to the cytogenetic analysis of human stomach cancers

  • Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cytogenetic studies of biopsy specimens endoscopically obtained from gastric cancers were performed in our laboratory. The necessity for well-spread chromosomes for analysis has resulted in the development of a new technique, in which culture medium containing acetylcholine (Ach) is used; with this new technique, the number of metaphases of analyzable karyotypes was significantly increased (P<0.01 compared with a previous method in which Ach was not used). The mean ratio of metaphase numbers of analyzable karyotypes in four cases in which Ach was used was 38.1±8.1%, a value more than four times the number in the seven cases in which Ach was not used. It is possible that Ach may decrease the viscosity of the cytoplasm in gastric cancer cells by disrupting microfilaments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Granberg I, Gupta S, Zech L. Chromosome analyses of metastatic gastric carcinoma including quinacrine fluorescence. Hereditas 1973;75:189–194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferti-Passantonopoulou AD, Panani AD, Vlachos JD, et al. Common cytogenetic findings in gastric cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1987;24:63–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ugryumov EP, Tsoneva-Maneva MT. Karyotype study of monolayer culture of human stomach cancer cells. Bull Eksper Biol Med 1987;55:T465-T467.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ochi H, Douglass HO Jr, Sandberg AA. Cytogenetic studies in primary gastric cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1986; 22:295–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dippold WG, Kron G, Boosfeld E, et al. Signet ring stomach cancer: Morphological characterization and antigenic profile of a newly established cell line (Mz-Sto 1). Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1987;23:697–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez E, Rao PH, Ladanyi M, et al. 11p13–15 is a specific region of chromosomal rearrangement in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 1987;50:6410–6416.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seabright M. Rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 1971;ii:971–972.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. The General Rules for the Gastric Cancer Study [in Japanese] 12th ed. Kanehara Shuppan, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin P, Levin B, Golomb HM, et al. Chromosome analysis of primary large bowel tumors. A new method of improving the yield of analyzable metaphases. Cancer 1979;44:1656–1664.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weed A. Actin-binding proteins—regulators of cell architecture and motility. Nature 1982;296:811–816.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolosin JM, Okamoto C, Forte TM, et al. Actin and associated proteins in gastric epithelial, cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1983; 761:171–182.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aunis D, Bader M-F. The cytoskeleton as a barrier to exocytosis in secretory cells. J Exp Biol 1988;139:253–266.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schessner M, Schnorr B. Actin cytoskeleton and calcium-ATPase in the process of abomasal mucus secretion in cattle. Cell Tissue Res 1990;260:109–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schubert M, Shamburek RD. Control of acid secretion. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1990;19:1–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz J. Acid secretion and suppression. Med Clin North Am 1991;75:877–887.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hellewell SB, Taylor DL. The contractile bases of ameboid movement. J Cell Biol 1979;83:633–648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kane RE Actin polymerization and interaction with other proteins in temperature-induced gelation of sea urchin egg extracts. J Cell Biol 1976;71:704–714.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burridge K, Feramisco JR. Non-muscle α-actinins are calcium-sensitive actin binding proteins. Nature 1981;294:565–567.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park J-G, Frucht H, LaRocca RV, et al. Characteristics of cell lines established from human gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res 1990;50:2773–2780.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamb NJC, Fernandez A, Conti MC, et al. Regulation of actin microfilament integrity in living nonmuscle cells by the c-AMP-dependent protein kinase and the myosin light chain kinase. J Cell Biol 1988;106:1955–1971.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasaki K, Pinkel D, Tsukahara M, et al. Detection of a human chromosomal translocation t(8,9) in a baby with multiple malformations using two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Pathol Int 1994;44:145–150.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bardi G, Johansson B, Pandis N, et al. Cytogenetic aberrations in colorectal adenocarcinomas and their correlation with clinicopathologic features. Cancer 1993;71:306–314.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sasai, K., Nakada, T., Tanaka, R. et al. Use of acetylcholine (Ach) for spreading metaphase chromosomes and application to the cytogenetic analysis of human stomach cancers. J Gastroenterol 30, 310–314 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347504

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347504

Key words

Navigation