Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological changes in gastric carcinoma with progression

  • Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By combining morphological two indices, namely, (1) the degree of differentiation of glandular tubules (well or poor) and (2) the amount of intracellular mucus (rich or poor), we previously classified histological types of gastric carcinoma into four types. Using this histological classification, we studied the morphological changes of gastric carcinoma according to extra-gastric invasion in 200 autopsy and 200 resected cases. In cases in which the predominant histological type in the lamina propria was “tubular differentiation—well, mucus in cytoplasm—poor,” there was a greater incidence of co-existence with other histological types. In many of these cases, the predominant histological findings changed to “tubular differentiation—poor” in the subserosa, followed by direct invasion into neighboring extra-gastric tissues. In all cases in which the predominant histological type in the lamina propria was “tubular differentiation —poor”, the predominant histological type in the subserosa was also “tubular differentiation—poor”. To understand the mode of extension of gastric carcinoma in relation to the histological type, we must consider not only the characteristics of the predominant histological types of carcinoma but also those of coexisting types, especially in cases of “tubular differentiation—well, mucus in cytoplasm—poor”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goseki N, Takizawa T, Koike M. Differences in the mode of extension of gastric cancer classified by histological type: New histological classification of gastric carcinoma. Gut 1992;33: 606–612.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. The general rules for study of gastric cancer in surgery and pathology. 11th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jarvi O, Lauren P. On the role of the heterotopias of the intestinal epithelium in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1951;29:26–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirota T, Itabashi M, Suzuki K, Yoshida S. Clinicopathological study of minute and small early gastric cancer. Pathol Anna 1980;15:1–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ming SC. Gastric carcinoma: A pathological classification. Cancer 1977;39:2475–2485.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kato Y, Kitagawa T, Nakamura K, Sugano H. Changes in the histological types of gastric carcinoma in Japan. Cancer 1981;48:2084–2087.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Oota K, Sobin LH. International histological classiffication of tumors. No 18: Histological typing of gastric and oesophageal tumors. Geneva: WHO, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin IG, Dixon MF, Sue-Ling H, Axon ATR, Johnston D. Goseki histological grading of gastric cancer is an important predictor of outcome. Gut 1994;35:758–763.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miura K. Age Differences in the histology and growth pattern of gastric cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Geriatr 1968;5:262–273.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Enjoji M. On the changes produced in course of time in the histological picture of human carcinoma (in Japanese with English abstract). Tr Soc Pathol Jpn 1958;47:203–220

    Google Scholar 

  11. Enjoji M. Histological observation of fluctuations in the growth of cancer. (Changes in histological character of cancer during its growing course as observed in the same cases) (in Japanese with English abstract). Fukuoka Acta Med 1953; 44:280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Enjoji M, Koga S. Modification of histologic picture in patients with gastric carcinoma: Study of cases with recurrence more than 5 years after the surgery (in Japanese with English abstract). Stom Intestine 1977;12:33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Enjoji M. Histological examination of early gastric carcinoma (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Cancer Clin 1961; 7:96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enjoji M. Histological architecture of gastric carcinoma and its pathological significance (in Japanese with English abstract). Fukuoka Acta Med 1955;46:496–520.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirimoto K, Histo-morphological comparison between primary and metastatic lesions in gastric cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). Handai-Isi (Osaka Med J) 1958;10:1223–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaieda O. A histopathological study of gastric carcinoma: Diversity of cancer parenchyma (in Japanese with English abstract). Kagoshima Med J 1965;17:247–276.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takagi K. Histopathological study on mucosal carcinoma of the stomach (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Cancer Clin 1959;5:737–754.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nagayo T, Komagoe T. Histological studies of gastric mucosal cancer with special reference to relationship of histological picture between the mucosal cancer and the cancer-bearing gastric mucosa. GANN-Jpn J Cancer Res 1961;52:109–119.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oota K, Tanaka M. Colliding carcinomas of the stomach. (A consideration of histogenesis of a single malignant tumor in general). GANN-Jpn J Cancer Res 1952;43:210–212.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oota K. Igan no Hassei (in Japanese). Tr Soc Pathol Jpn) 1964;53:3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Willis RA. The spread of tumors in the human body. London: Butterworth, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goseki, N., Maruyama, M., Takizawa, T. et al. Morphological changes in gastric carcinoma with progression. J Gastroenterol 30, 287–294 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347501

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347501

Key words

Navigation