Skip to main content
Log in

PIXE and charge-induced X-rays (CHIX): Are they complementary or competitive?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhanced yields from CHIX studies on non-conducting samples have demonstrated conclusively that such yields are exceptionally high when compared to PIXE at low incident particle energies. This was confirmed with low energy14N+,16O+ and20Ne+ ions whose X-ray production crosssections are negligibly small for PIXE yields. In particular, a combination of low incident energies and high X-ray yields could be useful for XSQR investigations and elemental studies with low energy accelerators. Furthermore, extended studies on pure metal targets revealed that the PIXE yield could be improved by insulating the targets thus making them suitable to produce the CHIX yield under identical experimental conditions. This paper discusses the complementary and competitive features of PIXE and CHIX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. M. Peisach, A. E. Pillay, C. A. Pineda, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., B75 (1993) 14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. C. M. Mboweni, C. A. Pineda, M. Peisach, A. E. Pillay, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., B85 (1994) 138.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Peisach, C. A. Pineda, A. E. Pillay, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., B85 (1994) 100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Peisach, C. A. Pineda, A. E. Pillay, J. Radional. Nucl. Chem., 178 (1994) 387.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Peisach, C. A. Pineda, A. E. Pillay, K. A. Springhorn, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., B94 (1994) 540.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., B94 (1994) 545.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 188 (1994) 453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 189 (1995) 283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Radional. Nucl. Chem., 199 (1995) 65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 199 (1995) 125.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 200 (1995) 53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 200 (1995) 85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, X-Ray Spectrom., 24 (1995) 118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. E. Pillay, M. Peisach, J. Chem. Ed., 73 (1996) 508.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. E. Pillay andM. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 231 (1998) 123.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. I. S. Giles, PhD Thesis, University of Cape Town, 1978.

  17. Indiana University Cyclotron Facility, Scientific and Technical Report, 1987, p. 165.

  18. S. A. E. Johansson, T. B. Johansson, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 137 (1976) 473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Peisach, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 110 (1987) 461.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pillay, A.E. PIXE and charge-induced X-rays (CHIX): Are they complementary or competitive?. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 241, 227–229 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347319

Keywords

Navigation